Senate rebuff of Trump sets bill into law

Defense measure backed; $2,000 checks hit GOP wall

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Friday voted to turn a $741 billion defense authorization bill into law over President Donald Trump’s objections, delivering the first successful veto override of his presidency in the waning days of his administration.

The 81-13 vote in the Senate on the widely popular defense bill followed an earlier 322-87 override vote in the House. The bill affirms a 3% pay raise for U.S. troops and guides defense policy, cementing decisions about troop levels, new weapons systems and military readiness, personnel policy and other military goals.

Arkansas’ delegation was split, with Sen. John Boozman voting for the override, and Sen. Tom Cotton against.

Ahead of the vote on rejecting the president’s veto, Senate Republicans blocked a Trump-endorsed effort to increase the size of stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000.

The move on checks prompted an angry response from the president. “Pathetic!!!” Trump tweeted. “Now they want to give people ravaged by the China Virus $600, rather than the $2000 which they so desperately need. Not fair, or smart!”

Trump’s last-minute push for larger pandemic relief checks had aligned him with Senate Democrats, who seized on the president’s support to advocate for the increased payments, at a cost of $464 billion.

“The Senate can start off 2021 by really helping the American people,” Senate

Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said. “We can start off 2021 by sending $2,000 checks to struggling American families to carry them through the darkest and final days of this pandemic.”

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., refused to send the package passed by the House to the Senate floor, dismissing it as “socialism for rich people.”

For months, Trump’s objections to the defense bill cast a shadow over negotiations between the House and Senate over the measure, despite the fact that veto-proof, bipartisan majorities had voted in favor of earlier versions of the legislation.

In particular, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, argued that lawmakers would have to excise provisions ordering the removal of Confederate names from bases in order to pass the bill. But by early December, Inhofe gave up his protest and on Friday, he cheered the passage of the defense bill over Trump’s objections.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the “sweeping and overwhelmingly bipartisan votes” in the House and Senate “delivered a resounding rebuke to President Trump’s reckless assault on America’s military and national security.”

Trump’s veto of the National Defense Authorization Act “would have hurt the health, financial security and safety of our servicemembers, their families, our veterans and our allies and partners worldwide,” Pelosi said. “Instead of keeping Americans safe, the president continues to use his final moments in office to sow chaos and undermine our security.”

The defense bill “looks after our brave men and women who volunteer to wear the uniform,” McConnell said. “But it’s also a tremendous opportunity: to direct our national security priorities to reflect the resolve of the American people and the evolving threats to their safety, at home and abroad. It’s our chance to ensure we keep pace with competitors like Russia and China.”

The defense bill contains new restrictions on how much of the military’s construction budget the president may move by emergency order — a direct response to Trump’s efforts to divert billions of the Pentagon’s dollars toward the border wall. It also limits the president’s ability to draw down troop levels in Germany, South Korea and Afghanistan — a move Trump had planned over the objections of members of his own party.

In his veto statement last month, Trump included the measure’s restrictions on troop deployments high on his list of grievances with the legislation. He also objected to the bill’s mandate to the Pentagon to change the names of installations honoring members of the Confederacy. And he complained that the legislation did not include a repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a law that gives technology companies certain liability protections from content third parties post to their websites.

Trump has taken aim at Section 230 as part of a larger campaign against social media companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google, which he has accused of harboring anti-conservative bias.

Both Democrats and Republicans agree that Section 230 is flawed and in need of modification, but most lawmakers have bristled at Trump’s efforts to repeal it as part of the defense bill.

In recent days, as the debate over stimulus checks threatened to hamper the defense bill override, McConnell sought to short-circuit the debate by tying any increased checks to a repeal of Section 230 and a commission to examine the 2020 election. Neither that measure nor the original Housepassed bill was ever sent to a floor vote in the Senate. The combination quickly divided whatever support existed for the $2,000 checks proposal along political lines.

The National Defense Authorization Act is now the first such bill in 60 years to become law by a congressional override vote, instead of the president’s signature.

The defense bill also establishes new mechanisms for countering China and cyberthreats. It creates a Pacific Deterrence Initiative to bolster efforts to counter China in Asia, with an emphasis on containing Chinese maritime forces. That initiative is modeled on a measure Congress established in 2015 to counter Russian aggression.

The legislation also establishes a new cybersecurity director position to better coordinate such activities governmentwide. That effort follows a major breach of private companies and U.S. government agencies, including the Treasury and State departments, by Russian hackers working for the SVR, Russia’s foreign intelligence agency.

Trump has dismissed the defense legislation as a “gift” to China, complaining that it does not do enough to encourage the development of next-generation 5G networks in the United States.

The bill withholds final approval from Ligado, a company that recently won permission from the Federal Communications Commission to build such networks using radio frequencies that the Pentagon has warned are dangerously close to bandwidth it uses for sensitive military operations. The White House was pushing the Pentagon to open a spectrum-leasing program this year in order to foster the development of a nationwide 5G network.