New drug for Alzheimer’s reported to show promise

Eli Lilly & Co. presented highly anticipated details from a midstage study showing that its experimental drug modestly slowed Alzheimer’s disease progression over about 18 months.

The study of 257 patients with early Alzheimer’s showed that Lilly’s donanemab slowed decline by 32% on a composite measure of cognition and function when compared with a placebo. It also completely removed an Alzheimer’s-associated protein from the brains of the majority of patients who received it.

The results are being watched closely by Wall Street analysts and researchers for a hint of whether donanemab — or any other drugs that eliminate amyloid, a telltale protein that accumulates in Alzheimer’s patients’ brains — will finally work. Over the years, numerous other candidates have aimed at amyloid only to yield confusing or negative results in human trials.

Lilly’s results appear to be more straightforward than many previous studies, said Marwan Sabbagh, director of translational research at the Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health in Las Vegas.

“I have been in this field a long time,” Sabbagh, who wasn’t involved in the study, said in an interview. “This is some of the best phase 2 data I have seen, hands down.”

Lilly first announced the top-line results in January, sending its stock soaring, but the virtual presentation Saturday at the International Conference on Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s Diseases meeting is the first detailed unveiling. The trial data is also being published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

On secondary goals of the study, including certain other dementia rating scales that have been commonly used in other Alzheimer’s trials, the findings weren’t as clearcut. While patients on the drug did numerically better on these various other scales compared with placebos, the differences weren’t statistically significant in some cases.

“Results for secondary outcomes were mixed,” researchers from Lilly, Brown University, and the Indiana University School of Medicine concluded in the journal article. Longer, larger trials are required to further understand the drug’s effects and side-effect profile, they said.

Given the number of previous Alzheimer’s trial failures, “I was surprised and impressed by these results,” said David Knopman, a neurologist and dementia researcher at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. He called it “a small but significant clinical benefit” and said the finding needs to be confirmed in another trial.

Key unknowns include whether the benefit lasts over the long term, and whether patients and caregivers would consider that modest benefit to be meaningful, Knopman said. He wasn’t involved in the trial, but has been involved in studies of other Lilly Alzheimer’s drugs.

Side effects of the Lilly drug in the trial included brain swelling spotted on imaging scans, drug-infusion reactions and nausea.

For more than a year, the Alzheimer’s disease field has been consumed by another drug that targets amyloid, Biogen Inc.’s aducanumab.

Trials of aducanumab have produced confusing results that have sharply divided Alzheimer’s disease researchers. It’s under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which is scheduled to make a decision by June.

Lilly’s chief scientific officer, Daniel Skovronksy, said the company selected a subset of patients with high amyloid levels and middling levels of tau, a second abnormal protein linked to brain-cell death. The goal was to study patients who weren’t too late in the disease to treat, yet were affected enough to show a benefit if the drug worked, he said.

“This is a really profound effect that appeared early,” he said. “We are in discussions with regulators around the world about this data.”

He declined to go into details about next steps for the drug. Lilly has another efficacy trial of the therapy ongoing.