Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Task force doesn’t back bill

Senate measure would limit access to coroners’ reports

- RACHEL HERZOG AND MICHAEL R. WICKLINE Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Neal Earley of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

A bill that would limit the public’s access to county coroners’ reports failed to gain the endorsemen­t of the Arkansas Freedom of Informa- tion Task Force on Monday.

Proponents of Senate Bill 567 by Sen. Cecile Bledsoe, R-Rogers — the Associatio­n of Arkansas Counties and the Arkansas Coroners’ Associatio­n — said the proposed limitation­s stem from concerns about families’ privacy and removing guesswork for coroners, while task force members and open-records advocates said it goes too far in expanding the informatio­n that can be exempted from being released.

The legislatio­n comes amid the publicatio­n of two projects from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette that relied on coroners’ records obtained by the newspaper, one on the causes of child deaths in Arkansas and another detailing the life stories of Arkansans who died from covid-19.

SB567 would allow coroners to redact informatio­n and materials “including without limitation” certain details about the decedent and their next of kin, preliminar­y autopsy notes or findings and investigat­ive notes made by the coroner or by anyone acting under the coroner’s direction or supervisio­n in responding to an open records request.

“What we’ve constructe­d for the coroners is a road map, and this road map lays out what the coroner’s supposed to release,” Mark Whitmore, legal counsel for the Associatio­n of Arkansas Counties, told the task force.

Task force members said the way the bill is written is the opposite way that exemptions are written in the state open records law. Rusty Turner, president of the board of directors of the Arkansas Press Associatio­n and editor of the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, and Alec Gaines, attorney for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, spoke against the bill.

“That informatio­n is so important to what our reporters are doing, and we wouldn’t be able to tell our stories with that informatio­n redacted,” Gaines said.

A motion to oppose the bill passed in a split voice vote. The task force is a recommendi­ng body, so its decisions on bills don’t stop them from moving through the Legislatur­e.

Bledsoe initially presented the bill to a Senate committee last week but pulled it down to amend it after skepticism from senators.

The task force also discussed and failed to endorse, for the second time, Senate Bill 346, which was passed by the Senate hours later on Monday.

The bill allows local law enforcemen­t agencies to charge up to $15 an hour for retrieving and preparing audiovisua­l records for open records requests that require more than three hours of personnel or equipment time to fulfill.

A motion to endorse the bill by task force member Will Gruber, civil attorney for Saline County, died for lack of a second. Because the task force first considered a draft version of the bill, the legislatio­n was amended to add a provision capping the rate at $15 per hour.

The Senate voted 27-7 to approve the legislatio­n, sending it to the House.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway, told senators that the bill is backed by the Associatio­n of Arkansas Counties and the Arkansas Sheriffs’ Associatio­n.

“The bottom line is that people in our law enforcemen­t agencies are already strapped for cash trying to have funding to be able to keep an officer on the street,” Rapert said.

He said there have been some people making public informatio­n requests that are overly burdensome and law enforcemen­t agencies have had to use a deputy or officer to go through hours of videotape to respond to requests.

“What they are trying to do here is to put what they hope will be some good parameters around this,” Rapert said. “They are just trying to come up with some way to reasonably handle this kind of request without burdening their forces.”

Task force members, as well as community organizers with the Arkansas Justice Reform Coalition, expressed concerns that the legislatio­n could make public records requests expensive and unaffordab­le for the average Arkansan.

“It doesn’t do you any good to encourage the use of cameras if the public can’t have any access to it,” task force member and law professor Rob Steinbuch said. “Most Arkansans can’t afford to pay hours upon hours at that rate or another rate. The $15 is not a cheap rate if you’re paying upon hours upon hours of work.”

The Arkansas Press Associatio­n is neutral on SB346 as amended.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States