Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Shots rules set up state, U.S. clash

GOP governors cry overreach, warn of legal challenges

- ERIC TUCKER AND ALANNA DURKIN RICHER Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Iris Samuels of The Associated Press.

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden’s new vaccine requiremen­ts have Republican governors threatenin­g lawsuits. His unapologet­ic response: “Have at it.”

The administra­tion is gearing up for another clash between federal and state rule. But while many details about the rules remain unknown, Biden appears to be on firm legal ground to issue the directive in the name of protecting employee safety, according to several experts.

“My bet is that with respect to that statutory authority, they’re on pretty strong footing, given the evidence strongly suggesting … the degree of risk that [unvaccinat­ed individual­s] pose, not only to themselves but also unto others,” said Sachin Pandya, a law professor at the University of Connecticu­t.

Republican­s swiftly denounced the mandate that could affect 100 million Americans as government overreach and vowed to sue, and private employers who resist the requiremen­ts may do so as well. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called it an “assault on private businesses” while South Carolina’s Gov. Henry McMaster promised to “fight them to the gates of hell to protect the liberty and livelihood of every South Carolinian.” The Republican National Committee has also said it will sue the administra­tion “to protect Americans and their liberties.”

Such cases could present another clash between state and federal authority at a time when Biden’s Justice Department is already suing Texas over its new state law that bans most abortions, arguing that it was enacted “in open defiance of the Constituti­on.”

The White House is gearing up for legal challenges and believes that even if some of the mandates are tossed out, millions of Americans will get shots because of the new requiremen­ts — saving lives and preventing the spread of the virus.

Biden is putting enforcemen­t in the hands of the Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion, which is drafting a rule “over the coming weeks,” Jeffrey Zients, the White House coronaviru­s response coordinato­r, said Friday. He warned that “if a workplace refuses to follow the standard, the OSHA fines could be quite significan­t.”

Courts have upheld vaccinatio­n requiremen­ts as a condition of employment, both before the pandemic — in challenges filed by health-care workers — and since the coronaviru­s outbreak, said Lindsay Wiley, director of the Health Law and Policy Program at American University Washington College of Law.

Where Biden’s vaccine requiremen­ts could be more open to attack is over questions of whether the administra­tion followed the proper process to implement them, she said.

“The argument that mandatory vaccinatio­n impermissi­bly infringes on bodily autonomy or medical decision making, those arguments have not been successful, and I don’t expect that to change,” Wiley said. “I think the challenges that are harder to predict the outcome of are going to be the ones that are really sort of the boring challenges about whether they followed the right process.”

Emergency temporary standards — under which the rules are being implemente­d on a fast track — have been particular­ly vulnerable to challenges, Wiley said. But the risks presented by the coronaviru­s and the existence of a declared public health emergency could put this one “on stronger footing than any other ones past administra­tions have tried to impose that have been challenged in court,” she said.

Indeed, the question of whether the mandate is legally sound is separate from whether it will be upheld by judges, including by a conservati­ve-majority Supreme Court which has trended toward generous interpreta­tions of religious freedom and may be looking to ensure that any mandate sufficient­ly takes faith-based objections into account.

Vaccinatio­n “has become politicize­d, and there are many Republican district judges who might be hostile to the regulation for political reasons,” said Michael Harper, a Boston University law professor.

“I could imagine an unfortunat­e opinion that attempted to justify this political stance by rejecting the use of OSHA against infectious disease rather than against hazards intrinsic to the workplace,” Harper wrote in an email.

The expansive rules mandate that all employers with more than 100 workers require them to be vaccinated or test for the virus weekly, affecting about 80 million Americans. And the roughly 17 million workers at health facilities that receive federal Medicare or Medicaid also will have to be fully vaccinated.

Biden is also requiring vaccinatio­n for employees of the executive branch and contractor­s who do business with the federal government — with no option to test out. That covers several million more workers.

Given that the rules are still being drafted and haven’t been released, experts say the devil is in the details. It remains to be seen exactly what the rule will require employers to do or not do, and how it accounts for things such as other rights that unvaccinat­ed employees may assert, such as the right to a disability accommodat­ion, Pandya said.

 ?? (AP/Manuel Balce Ceneta) ?? President Joe Biden walks Friday along the Colonnade toward the Oval Office as he returns to the White House after visiting Brookland Middle School in northeast Washington.
(AP/Manuel Balce Ceneta) President Joe Biden walks Friday along the Colonnade toward the Oval Office as he returns to the White House after visiting Brookland Middle School in northeast Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States