Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Numbers in recall favoring Newsom

Analysts: Repeat of ’03 not likely

- KATHLEEN RONAYNE

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — It’s a familiar refrain among California’s recall watchers: 2021 is not 2003.

Yes, the state again is in the middle of a recall election that could remove the Democratic governor from office. But today’s California electorate looks far different than it did 18 years ago: It’s less Republican, more Latino and Asian, and younger — all trends that favor Gov. Gavin Newsom, so long as he can get his voters to turn out.

“Newsom has always had it by the numbers, and he knows that,” said Mindy Romero, director of the Center for Inclusive Democracy at the University of Southern California and an expert on voters and the electorate.

Early voting has been going on for weeks and more than 7 million ballots have been cast so far. The final day to vote is Tuesday.

There are two questions on the ballot: Should Newsom be recalled and, if so, who should replace him? If a majority wants him gone, whoever gets the most support among the 46 names on the replacemen­t ballot will become governor. It would almost certainly be a Republican, since no Democrat with political standing is running.

The recall began as an effort driven by amateur Republican political organizers upset by Newsom’s positions on immigratio­n, crime and other issues. But the coronaviru­s pandemic, and frustratio­ns over business and school closures, got it on the ballot.

In 2003, Democrat Gray Davis became the first California governor to be recalled. He had just begun his second term, and voters were agitated over an energy crisis that had led to rolling power failures, looming tax-and-fee increases and a poor economy. Republican Arnold Schwarzene­gger jumped into the race and won handily.

Back then, about 9 million of nearly 15 million registered voters participat­ed in the race. Roughly 4 million backed Davis, or 44%. On the question of who should replace him, Schwarzene­gger got about 4.2 million votes.

At the time, about 35% of voters were registered Republican­s, 43% were Democrats and 16% weren’t in a party.

Today, California has 22 million registered voters, but the Republican Party claims just a quarter of the electorate because registrati­on numbers have remained essentiall­y flat, hovering above 5 million. Democrats, meanwhile, have added 3 million voters, and 2.6 million more people are independen­ts.

Hispanic voters now make up more than a quarter of registered voters compared with 17.5% in 2003, according to data provided by Romero. Asian voters also increased their share, now at 10.4%. As those demographi­c groups have grown, the overall electorate is younger.

All of those trends should benefit Democrats, who have only strengthen­ed their hold on the state over the past two decades. California­ns haven’t elected a Republican to elected office since 2006, when Schwarzene­gger won a second term.

But Sonja Diaz, founding director of the Latino Policy & Politics Initiative at the University of California, Los Angeles, said the party can’t be taking Hispanic voters for granted, particular­ly as their power as a voting bloc expands. They now make up 40% of California’s population, more than any other racial or ethnic group. Yet they are less likely to vote than other groups.

Campaigns often focus on likely voters, which usually means people with a track record of participat­ing. Though a focus on those voters certainly helps candidates win in the short term, the Democratic Party should be thinking out a long-term strategy for turning nonwhite voters into regular participan­ts, Diaz said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States