Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Justices question impact of inmate’s chaplain case

- JESSICA GRESKO

WASHINGTON — Conservati­ve U.S. Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism Tuesday about a Texas death row inmate’s demand that a chaplain be allowed to pray out loud and touch him during his execution.

Executions in Texas, the nation’s busiest death-penalty state, have been delayed while the court considers the question. The outcome won’t take anyone off death row but could make clear what religious accommodat­ions officials must make for inmates who are being put to death.

Members of the court’s conservati­ve majority suggested that requiring Texas to accommodat­e the inmate’s request could lead to a string of cases seeking other accommodat­ions. A lawyer for the inmate said he would be content to have his spiritual adviser touch his foot during his execution, but justices questioned what requests might come next.

“What’s going to happen when the next prisoner says that I have a religious belief that he should touch my knee? He should hold my hand. He should put his hand over my heart. He should be able to put his hand on my head. We’re going to have to go through the whole human anatomy with a series of cases,” Justice Samuel Alito said.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh also expressed concerns about what ruling for the inmate would mean for requests in the future, with Kavanaugh asking whether all states would have to follow a single state’s accommodat­ions.

What if, he asked, one state “allows bread and wine in the execution room right before the execution” or allows the minister to “hug the inmate?” Do other states have to do that?

Kavanaugh suggested that if the justices rule for the Texas inmate, “this is going to be a heavy part of our docket for years to come.”

The case before the justices involves John Henry Ramirez, who is on death row for killing a Corpus Christi, Texas, convenienc­e store worker during a 2004 robbery. Ramirez stabbed the man, Pablo Castro, 29 times and robbed him of $1.25.

Ramirez’s lawyers sued after Texas said it would not allow his minister to pray audibly and touch him as he is given a lethal injection. Lower courts had sided with Texas, but the Supreme Court halted his Sept. 8 execution to hear his case.

Texas says an inmate’s spiritual adviser may pray with and counsel him until he is taken into the execution chamber and restrained on a gurney. But Texas says that after that, while the spiritual adviser can be nearby, he can’t speak to or touch the inmate.

“An outsider touching the inmate during lethal injection poses an unacceptab­le risk to the security, integrity, and solemnity of the execution,” Texas has told the justices.

Texas also says Ramirez’s request is just another attempt to delay his execution.

Ramirez’s attorneys told the court that a federal law that protects the religious rights of prisoners requires the state to allow his pastor to audibly pray and lay hands on him as he is put to death.

“These ministrati­ons are deeply rooted in petitioner’s sincere religious beliefs and reflect the fundamenta­l importance of prayer, song, and human touch as powerful expression­s of Christian faith. To deny them imposes a substantia­l burden on petitioner’s free exercise of religion,” they have told the court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States