Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

How should adult react to kid’s spilled milk?

- OPINION CAROLYN HAX Chat online with Carolyn at 11 a.m. each Friday at washington­post. com. Write to Tell Me About It in care of The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071; or email tellme@washpost.com

DEAR CAROLYN: I am interested in your approach when responding to a child who knows he made a mistake. Example: My nephew walks through the kitchen and says, “No one spilled their milk outside.” Naturally, he had spilled his milk outside. He didn’t actually break any rules or disobey me, he just had an accident. That doesn’t bother me at all because it’s outside.

Is it necessary for me to respond? I picked up his cup and put it with the dirty dishes. Obviously he felt bad for not being careful with the milk, thus his lie. If anything, that makes me wonder if I overreacte­d to accidents in the past. Does the situation require more from me?

— Anonymous

DEAR READER: So the accident would have bothered you if it had happened inside? It was an accident either way. Even a careful person can spill.

I think that’s the path to your answer: Yes, respond gently to accidents. Reflect the intent, not the outcome.

Note too the use of “respond” vs. “react”: Generally we’re not at our best when we’re reacting. We also can’t reasonably expect ourselves to bat 1.000 on responding thoughtful­ly in every moment; sometimes a yell comes out when the milk does. But these are still the right goals to set — never to yell at a child, and never to treat an oops as a choice.

As for your example, the milk spill wasn’t worth a correction, but the lie was. “‘No one’? Well, please tell No One that it’s OK, spills happen — but telling the truth is the best way to fix a mistake.” Raise eyebrow. Wait for a response. This is another area where 1.000 is unrealisti­c, but gentle responses to truth-telling, repeated over a childhood, send the message that you’re a safe place for truths to be told.

DEAR CAROLYN: I have a 15-month-old, and due to the pandemic, none of my family has met my son in person yet. As you can imagine, this has been incredibly difficult. We video call with my parents once a week and are looking forward to the vaccine becoming available for young children.

Both my sister-in-law and her mother made comments on a recent video call that I found very insensitiv­e. I like them both and generally have a good relationsh­ip with them. One, a doctor, said she didn’t think a vaccine for kids under 5 would ever be released. The other said any screen time for kids under 2 was bad for their developmen­t. I countered with reasons video calls with friends and family do not have the same negative effects as watching passive content. She dismissed this.

I feel this was insensitiv­e and they should have kept these things to themselves. They know the only contact my parents have with my son is by video and they know we are waiting to get him vaccinated before traveling.

Should I let these comments go? If not, how best to broach them? I was really hurt.

— Far From Home

DEAR READER: You’re doing your best under awful circumstan­ces. You know that.

So give yourself some grace by declining their invitation­s to a political proxy war and just extending some grace to them: They think they’re helping. Bless their hearts.

Keep doing what you need to do.

 ?? ?? (Washington Post Writers Group/Nick Galifianak­is)
(Washington Post Writers Group/Nick Galifianak­is)
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States