Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Chinese drone firm suspends business in warring nations

- CHRISTIAN SHEPHERD Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Lyric Li and Vic Chiang of The Washington Post.

Chinese drone maker DJI, the world’s largest manufactur­er of commercial drones, has suspended operations in Ukraine and Russia, becoming the first major Chinese company to openly quit the markets over a war that the leadership in Beijing refuses to condemn.

The privately owned Shenzhen-based company said in a statement on Tuesday that it was undergoing an internal compliance assessment and would temporaril­y halt activity in both countries pending an outcome. It was unclear what triggered the decision, which a company spokespers­on told Chinese media was “not a statement targeting any particular country but rather a statement about our principles.”

Russia’s assault on Ukraine has increased scrutiny on DJI over fears that Beijing’s close geopolitic­al partnershi­p with Moscow might hamper the company’s efforts to prevent its products from being used by the Russian army.

Beijing’s official position regarding President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is to claim neutrality while maintainin­g rhetorical support for Russia and a normal economic relationsh­ip with its burgeoning geopolitic­al and trade partner — a potential lifeline for the Russian economy under the pressure of sanctions from the United States and its allies.

But for Chinese conglomera­tes with internatio­nal reach, continuing to do business in Russia could mean losing access to far more important markets in Europe and North America if they end up being targeted by secondary sanctions from Western government­s. Most Chinese companies with a presence in Russia have chosen to stay silent about their plans, while some have quietly adjusted operations to minimize exposure to the Russia market.

In March, Ukrainian Vice Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov published an open letter to DJI head Frank Wang, calling for him to stop doing business with Russia and alleging that the Russian army was using DJI products to guide its missiles.

Ukrainian officials have also raised concerns about apparent failures of DJI’s AeroScope system to reveal the location of nearby drones as well as their pilots. Some have alleged the system was being intentiona­lly tampered with to allow Russian-flown drones to evade Ukrainian radar.

DJI has denied the accusation­s, saying that the Aeroscope function cannot be turned off and offered to set up geofencing to block all DJI drones from flying over Ukraine regardless of who is piloting them. Last week, the company released a statement saying that DJI does not market or sell products for military use and refuses to “customize or enable modificati­ons that would enable our products for military use.”

Chinese companies seeking to lower their profile in Russia also face criticism domestical­ly from Chinese nationalis­ts who have pushed for boosting the Russian-Chinese alliance in the face of the West.

Early in the war, ride-hailing giant DiDi’s announceme­nt that it was scrapping expansion plans in Russia was met with backlash from those who accused the company of abandoning China’s partner in a time of need. The company later reversed its decision.

More than a month later, DJI’s decision has been met with a more muted response, in part because commentato­rs saw it as an evenhanded reflection of China’s official policy to not take sides. “Pretty good,” read one of the mostliked comments about the news on Chinese microblog Weibo, “this way, DJI announced it’s not helping either side, so if there are still traces of DJI on the battlefiel­d, then it’s nothing to do with DJI.”

Even so, some nationalis­t commentato­rs were unimpresse­d that DJI appeared to be acquiescin­g to internatio­nal pressure. Asked why the statement was made in English first, DJI public relations director Xie Tiandi replied that the internal review was a “small thing” and “not worth mentioning” but he had been compelled to provide a Chinese statement after seeing inaccurate discussion on the platform.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States