Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

USDA aims to bolster meat processing

Grants and loans target smaller players in highly concentrat­ed industry

- JOSH FUNK

OMAHA, Neb. — The Agricultur­e Department announced more than $223 million in grants and loans last week to help small and midsized meat processing plants expand as part of a larger $1 billion effort to help boost competitio­n in the highly concentrat­ed industry.

The effort is expected to increase cattle and pig slaughter capacity by more than 500,000 head a year and help poultry plants process nearly 34 million more birds while adding more than 1,100 jobs mostly in rural areas where the plants are located.

The Biden administra­tion wants to add meat processing capacity to give farmers and ranchers more options of where to sell the animals they raise while hopefully reducing prices for consumers by increasing competitio­n because the biggest companies now have so much power over pricing in the “highly, highly concentrat­ed and consolidat­ed” business, U.S. Agricultur­e Secretary Tom Vilsack said. In beef, the top four companies control 85% of the market while the top four firms control 70% of the pork market. The four biggest poultry processors control 54% of that business.

“We’re looking forward to these projects taking hold and creating new opportunit­y and new choice for producers and consumers,” Vilsack said.

The USDA’s move comes as President Joe Biden is highlighti­ng his achievemen­ts to voters before the Nov. 8 midterm elections. Several of the administra­tion’s recent announceme­nts have targeted rural areas in states that generally support more Republican­s than Democrats.

Vilsack said the Greater Omaha Packing company will use its grant to expand beef processing capacity roughly 30% to handle 700 head per day and add 275 more jobs. The Omaha company is one of the biggest of the 21 grant recipients nationwide that will share $73 million. Great

er Omaha will receive a $20 million grant to help pay for the planned $100 million expansion of its plant.

Iowa farmer Dan Pedersen who feeds about 12,000 head of cattle a year on his farm near Underwood that he sells to Greater Omaha said the project will be welcome because it will bring more competitio­n to the area.

“Any time you have more demand than supply, you’re going to win,” Pedersen said.

Some of the other grants will go to helping Pure Prairie reopen an idle poultry processing plant that will employ hundreds of people in Charles City, Iowa. And the Cutting Edge Meat Company in Leakesvill­e, Miss., expects to be able to reduce its current six-month backlog for beef and pork processing by expanding its capacity.

The other $150 million of funding will go to 12 loan programs that will help independen­t meat processors continue operating as they work to expand. And applicatio­ns for additional grants and loans are being accepted now for another round of spending next year.

The big meat processors maintain that supply and demand factors — not industry concentrat­ion — drive prices for beef, pork and poultry products. And they say processing capacity has been restrained by the ongoing shortage of people to work at these plants, which are typically in rural areas with small population­s.

The worker shortages were highlighte­d during the pandemic when a number of major meat processing plants had to shut down as the virus tore through them because so many workers became ill or had to quarantine. That contribute­d to shortages of meat in grocery stores that drove up prices.

The price paid for the animals that are slaughtere­d has long been a point of contention because even as meat prices soar with inflation and tight capacity in the industry, farmers and ranchers receive a relatively small share of the profits. Federal data shows that for every dollar spent on food, the share that went to ranchers and farmers dropped from 35 cents in the 1970s to 14 cents recently.

Agricultur­al economists have said that smaller processing plants also might have a hard time competing with the major meat companies because they are far less efficient than the big plants run by companies like Tyson, Smithfield Foods, Cargill, JBS, and Purdue Farms.

Besides these loans and grants, the White House has also adjusted administra­tive rules to make it easier for farmers and ranchers to report concerns or sue over anticompet­itive behavior. Officials are also planning new rules to label meat as a U.S. product to differenti­ate it from meat raised in other countries.

 ?? (AP/Keith Srakocic) ?? Rows of fresh meat are seen through the display coolers as a woman enters the retail section of the Wight’s Meat Packing facility in Fombell, Pa.
(AP/Keith Srakocic) Rows of fresh meat are seen through the display coolers as a woman enters the retail section of the Wight’s Meat Packing facility in Fombell, Pa.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States