Old House Journal

Making a case for preservati­on of an old stone house.

A post-Civil war house in a historic district enjoys a dramatic reversal of fortune. By Michele Eodice and Kami Day

-

For decades, this 850-square-foot house had been a poorly maintained rental property in a National Register neighborho­od in Lawrence, Kansas. It had been on the market for an unreasonab­ly long time, despite its coveted location near the historic downtown.

When we first toured the house, it was the weak link on a block of distinguis­hed homes. In the mid-20th century, the original porches had been removed and the house covered with asbestos shingles. Inside, holes had been brutally blasted through walls to add services. To make it easier for renters to share the house, a second arm was added to the existing staircase at the landing midway to the upper floor. The historic flooring was covered with carpet and vinyl and the walls with cheap wood paneling.

Our house had been deemed “non-contributi­ng” to the historic district, meaning it was ineligible to qualify for preservati­on tax credits. David Sain, of the design–build firm Rockhill and Associates,

Lawrence to get a partial-demolition permit, allowing removal of the siding and wall coverings, the carpet and vinyl flooring, partitions and cabinets. We found oak and fir tongue-and-groove flooring throughout. Though damaged and neglected, much of the original 1871 plaster (applied directly to the brick) was intact. In the 1905 wood-framed addition, plaster was on wood lath. We’d learned that the original house had been built by the plasterer J. Whiteside, which made preserving its plaster an even higher priority.

After explorator­y demolition, the building was deemed a contributi­ng structure, so work was eligible for tax credits if it met the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Design of the new work led to lengthy negotiatio­ns with the Lawrence Historic Resources Commission and the Kansas State Historic Preservati­on Office. The new porch follows the ghosting of the original wraparound, the shape of which was shown in a plan view on the 1905 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map. As there were no photos, we faced much consternat­ion about the appropriat­e design and details. In the end, we were required to keep it minimal to avoid upstaging the historic structure.

Rockhill and Associates was there for us from the beginning: they helped us find the house, were our architects, shepherded the preservati­on through historic reviews, and they did all the on-site work that local code would allow.

 ??  ?? ABOVE Asbestos shingles were removed to reveal the 1871 brick structure and the 1905 wood-framed addition. Evidence showed that a wraparound porch had connected the front door to the kitchen. Work included repointing brick walls; repairing siding and replacing damaged material with new cedar clapboards; repairing eaves; removing stucco from the stone foundation.
ABOVE Asbestos shingles were removed to reveal the 1871 brick structure and the 1905 wood-framed addition. Evidence showed that a wraparound porch had connected the front door to the kitchen. Work included repointing brick walls; repairing siding and replacing damaged material with new cedar clapboards; repairing eaves; removing stucco from the stone foundation.
 ??  ?? ABOVE The original bathroom upstairs kept its clawfoot tub. BEFORE Mid-20th-century paneling hid the condition of plaster. RIGHT At the top of the stairs, a bookcase lends enclosure to the bedroom. BELOW Minor changes upstairs allowed for a more open bedroom and two home-office spaces.
ABOVE The original bathroom upstairs kept its clawfoot tub. BEFORE Mid-20th-century paneling hid the condition of plaster. RIGHT At the top of the stairs, a bookcase lends enclosure to the bedroom. BELOW Minor changes upstairs allowed for a more open bedroom and two home-office spaces.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States