Orlando Sentinel (Sunday)

Tech, defense giants lobby for tax break

Companies to save billions if Congress agrees to keep it

- By Jason Garcia

Some of the world’s largest companies are lobbying Congress to preserve a lucrative tax break that saves them billions of dollars a year, even as the federal budget deficit swells amid efforts to contain the coronaviru­s and revive the sagging economy.

Aerospace and defense contractor­s Lockheed Martin Corp. and Raytheon Technologi­es Corp. would save $2 billion each in 2022 if lawmakers agree to keep the soon-to-expire corporate tax break, according to executives at the two companies.

Airplane manufactur­er Boeing Co. would save about $2.5 billion, according to estimates by analysts at investment bank UBS. One of Florida’s biggest companies — Brevard County-based defense firm L3Harris Inc. — would save an estimated $550 million.

Tech giants like Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp. would likely reap enormous savings, as well.

Preserving the tax break would save companies — and cost taxpayers — $40 billion in 2022, according to an estimate by the Tax Foundation, a business-backed think tank whose members include Microsoft.

Many companies would benefit from continuing the break. But the savings would be heavily concentrat­ed in a small number of big corporatio­ns: Lockheed Martin and Raytheon alone could account for 10 percent of the estimated impact in 2022.

By contrast, a similarly expensive tax break that Congress is also considerin­g — an expansion of the Child Tax Credit — would steer nearly two-thirds of the savings to households making less than $91,000, according to one recent estimate.

Industry executives say preserving the corporate tax break would leave them more money to spend investing in their businesses and hiring new workers — and also buying back stock and paying dividends to shareholde­rs.

“If that were to happen, I think that would be a major win for industry,” Lockheed Martin Chief Financial Officer Ken Possenried­e told analysts at a virtual conference earlier this month. “A major win because it would allow us to make more investment­s going forward, employ more people and generate more cash for our investment­s and for our shareholde­rs from a

Lockheed, which has approximat­ely 8,000 employees across Central Florida, turned a $6.2 billion profit last year on revenues of nearly $60 billion. The company spent more than half of the cash it generated for the year on share repurchase­s and dividend payments.

At issue is the way the companies write off their spending on research and developmen­t, such as the salaries of engineers or the materials and supplies used in labs. cash deployment standpoint.”

Since the mid-1950s, the U.S. has allowed companies to deduct all of their R&D costs at once, which is known as “expensing.” The tax break was expanded in the late 1960s to let companies expense software developmen­t costs, too.

R&D expensing has since ballooned into a major tax break, used by everyone from boat builders to videogame designers.

Fast forward to 2017. The then-Republican-controlled Congress and the Trump administra­tion wanted to pass an enormous package of tax cuts that included slashing the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent.

But in order to pass the bill through a narrowly divided U.S. Senate without having to win over any Democratic lawmakers, Republican­s had to find ways to soften the total budget hit of the tax cuts.

They decided to narrow or eliminate a number of existing tax breaks — including R&D expensing. As a result, starting in 2022, companies will no longer be able to write off their R&D costs immediatel­y but will instead

have to spread them out over at least five years.

“It was part of a tradeoff,” said George Callas, a Washington lobbyist who was senior tax counsel to former U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan, RWis. “It was really about raising a lot of revenue in a way that was less objectiona­ble because the bulk of the revenue tends to come from some very large multinatio­nals who are getting a significan­t corporate rate cut.”

But now, after booking big savings from that rate cut and other provisions in the 2017 tax law, companies want to get that R&D change rescinded before it can take effect.

“This is definitely having your cake and eating it, too,” said Reuven Avi-Yonah, a law professor and the director of the internatio­nal tax program at the University of Michigan’s law school

Avi-Yonah said expensing amounts to a big public subsidy for corporatio­ns. And he said it is one of the main reasons so many highly profitable corporatio­ns are able to claim paper losses on their tax returns.

“We could just give them money directly without doing it through the tax code. That way at least you’re in the budget as an outlay and it’ll be significan­tly more visible

to the public,” Avi-Yonah said. “But that’s exactly why the politician­s don’t like doing it that way.”

Corporate executives and other advocates say eliminatin­g the favorable tax treatment could lead to lower investment in R&D, which, they say, creates high-paying jobs and can lead to technologi­cal advances that have broader societal benefits.

“At the end of the day, you are talking about a meaningful impact and increase in terms of the costs associated with doing R&D,” said David Eiselsberg, the senior director for tax policy for the National Associatio­n of Manufactur­ers, whose board of directors includes executives from Microsoft and Raytheon, among others.

The change would hit hardest on companies that are continuall­y increasing the amount they spend on research and developmen­t, said Mitchell Kopelman, the co-chair of the tax practice at consulting firm Aprio.

“This is going to be very costly for any growing company, whether it’s an early stage company or a mature public company,” Kopelman said.

The COVID-19 pandemic, which has triggered a recession and the worst unemployme­nt crisis since the Great Depression, has complicate­d the lobbying campaign. But it has also provided a potential hook: Lobbyists for the companies are warning Congress that allowing the R&D tax break to expire would hinder the economic recovery.

An assortment of industry-funded groups — including the manufactur­ers’ associatio­n and the Business Roundtable — have asked congressio­nal leaders to include continued R&D expensing in an economic stimulus package.

“This crisis coupled with the change in the tax treatment of R&D spending will impact business cash flows as well as decisions on how to most efficientl­y allocate spending to projects such as those supporting transforma­tive innovation and research,” Sharon Heck, the treasurer and chief tax officer at Intel, wrote in a letter to congressio­nal leaders in March.

If the tax break doesn’t make into COVID-19 stimulus, lobbyists say they’ll push Congress to take the issue up later in the year — possibly in a lame-duck session after the November elections but before new members of Congress are sworn in. flalottery.com Selected Saturday Pick 2 (midday): 7-6

Pick 3 (midday): 8-7-8 Pick 4 (midday): 8-6-2-3 Pick 5 (midday): 1-5-1-0-5 Selected Friday

Pick 2 (evening): 9-2

Pick 3 (evening): 0-8-1 Pick 4 (evening): 0-4-0-4 Pick 5 (evening): 2-6-5-8-9 For more results, call 1-850-921-7529

Selected Friday Fantasy 5: 2-5-12-24-31 JackPot Triple Play: 2-3-9-16-41-45

Cash 4 Life: 13-14-15-35-42-4

Florida Lottery

Capitol complex Tallahasse­e, FL 32399-4016 Floridalot­tery.com

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States