Orlando Sentinel (Sunday)

How Democrats won the war of ideas

- David Brooks Brooks is a columnist for The New York Times.

Over the last 100 years, Americans have engaged in a long debate about the role of markets and the welfare state. Republican­s favored a limited government, fearing that a large nanny state would sap American dynamism and erode personal freedom. Democrats favored a larger state, arguing that giving people a basic economic security would enable themto take more risks and lead dignified lives.

That debate ebbed and flowed over the years, but 2020 has turned out to be a pivotal year in the struggle, and it looks now as ifwe can declare awinner. The Democrats won the big argument of the 20th century. It’s not that everybody has become a Democrat, but even many Republican­s are now embracing basic Democratic assumption­s. Americans across the board fear economic and physical insecurity more than an overweenin­g state. The era of big government is here.

In last week’s New York Times/Siena poll, two-thirds of Americans support allowing people to buy health insurance through the federal government, the public option. Two-thirds support Joe Biden’s $2 trillion plan to increase the use of renewable energy and build energy-efficient infrastruc­ture. Seventy-two percent of likely voters, including5­6% of Republican­s, support another $2 trillion in COVID-19 relief to individual­s aswell as state and local government­s.

COVID-19 has pushed voters to the left. It’s made Americans feel vulnerable and more likely to support government efforts to reduce that vulnerabil­ity. Astudy led by economists Alex Rees-Jones, John D’Attoma, Amedeo Piolatto and Luca Salvadori found that people in counties with high numbers of COVID-19 infections and deaths were significan­tly more likely to support expanding government-provided unemployme­nt insurance and expanding government-provided health care. This greater support for social safety net programs transcends political ideology.

The 2020 shift to the left follows years of leftward drift. In 2015, a majority of Americans believed that “government is doing toomany things better left to business and individual­s.” Now39% of Americans believe that, while59% think, “Government should do more to solve problems,” according to Pew Research Center.

Two-thirds of Americans think government should do more to fight the effects of climate change. At least60% of Americans support raising the minimum wage and providing tax credits to low-income workers. Eighty-two percent of voters and 70% of Republican­s would like to consider legislatio­n to expand paid family and medical leave.

It’s often said that in the age of polarizati­on the Democrats are moving left and the Republican­s are moving right, but that’s not true. As Charles Blahous and Robert Graboyes of the Mercatus Center show, both are moving left; it’s just that Democrats are moving left at 350mph while Republican­s are moving left at 50 mph.

To show how the whole frame of debate has shifted, Blahous and Graboyes list the policies that are commonly discussed among Democrats now but thatwould have been too far left to get a hearing at the Democratic National Convention of 1996. They’ve come up with many examples, including canceling college debt, more than doubling the minimumwag­e, shutting down coal-fired plants and guaranteei­ng every American a job. Then they look for current Republican policies thatwould have been considered too conservati­ve for the 1996 Republican National Convention. They couldn’t find any.

We can see the familiar historic pattern.

A crisis hits, like COVID-19, the financial crisis, World War II or the Great Depression. Government expands to meet the crisis. Republican­s eventually come around and ratify the expansion.

It should be said there are limits to how far left the country is drifting. This is still a nation where 72% of people call themselves moderates or conservati­ves, and only24% call themselves liberal. Americans still have a strong basic faith in democratic capitalism and dislike socialism, by a2-1margin.

In the background of this debate is the fact that the last 30 years of neoliberal economics have seen the greatest reduction in global poverty in all human history.

Even while support for government programs rises, trust in government is near record lows. Americans like it when government sends out checks to pay for things like child care, college and COVID19 relief. They do not like proposals that concentrat­e power in Washington.

Still, you can see why Donald Trump was careful, both in 2016 and 2020, to focus his campaign on cultural and American identity issues and studiously avoid having a debate on role-of-government issues. Even by 2016, Republican­s could no longer win that debate.

If youwant to get a sense of where the center of gravity might be on these issues, I’d point you to a report by Brink Lindsey and Samuel Hammond of the Niskanen Center. They call for amuch stronger social safety net to protect people fromthe hazards of life— poverty, sickness, joblessnes­s— but they also call for reform in three sectors where government has been captured by insider manipulati­on: housing, finance and health care.

Itwas a vigorous debate that lasted many decades, but the liberal welfare state won— a robust capitalist economy combined with generous social support.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States