Orlando Sentinel

Defending deal breakers: Picky singles right to wait

- By Lisa Bonos The Washington Post

Singles are often told they’re too picky when it comes to looking for a mate. Next time you hear that, you might point out that you’re just trying to avoid a bad match.

And, as a new study points out, picking a bad mate can be worse than passing up a good one.

A study of relationsh­ip deal breakers, published in the Personalit­y and Social Psychology Bulletin in October, noted that “natural selection has punished mating mistakes more harshly (i.e. death, disease, infertilit­y) than it has rewarded quality mating choices (i.e., living incrementa­lly longer, having incrementa­lly healthier offspring).”

The researcher­s, led by Peter K. Jonason of the University of Western Sydney, looked at six surveys of relationsh­ip deal breakers and found, among other things, that women have more deal breakers than men, since they’re the ones who have the potential to bear children with their prospectiv­e mates.

“Women are likely to be more selective about their relationsh­ip partners to avoid costly impregnati­on by low-quality mates,” the study notes, so women “should perceive more — or have lower tolerance for — deal breakers in potential mates.”

In one of the surveys included in this study, 5,541 participan­ts (single Americans ages 21 to over 76) were asked: When considerin­g a committed relationsh­ip with someone, which of the following would be deal-breakers to you? Respondent­s could select as many traits as they wanted from a list of 17 potential deal breakers, including things such

Researcher­s found that women have more deal breakers than men, since they’re the ones who have the potential to bear children with their prospectiv­e mates.

as lazy, too needy, too quiet, talks too much and bad sex.

For nearly every deal breaker, women were more likely to say the trait was a problem. The top five deal breakers, for both sexes were: disheveled or unclean appearance, lazy, too needy, lacks a sense of humor and lives more than three hours away from me. At the bottom of the list, as least likely to be deal breakers, were had kids, too athletic and not athletic.

Men rated a few deal breakers — having kids, living too far away, talks too much and a low sex drive — more commonly than women did. This “may reflect men’s greater concerns about resource investment in partners (and their families) and men’s somewhat higher interest in casual sex,” the researcher­s found.

In contrast, women were more likely to consider as deal breakers partners who lacked self-confidence, were too lazy and those who spent too much time watching television or playing video games.

In another survey covered in this study, women were more likely to report bad sex as a deal breaker; and for both genders, bad in bed was deemed a deal breaker in short-term relationsh­ips but not long-term ones.

Overall, the researcher­s found deal breakers to be smart and useful: “It is likely that deal breakers function as efficient, cost-sensitive cognitive mechanisms designed to cull inappropri­ate potential partners, allowing mating preference­s to operate within a reduced target of desirable mates.”

So go ahead and dump that lazy dude who’s clinging to you and your sofa. It might propel him to try harder next time.

 ?? JAMIE GRILL/TETRA IMAGES ??
JAMIE GRILL/TETRA IMAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States