Orlando Sentinel

The Trump administra­tion

- By Michael A. Memoli michael.memoli@latimes.com

is continuing its tough talk against “sanctuary cities,” which shelter people living in the country illegally by refusing to help the federal government enforce immigratio­n laws.

WASHINGTON — The idea of Attorney General Jeff Sessions going to the White House to announce continuati­on of an Obama administra­tion policy related to immigratio­n would have been unthinkabl­e months ago. But that’s what happened Monday.

Sessions, decrying the safety risk posed when cities don’t cooperate with federal immigratio­n authoritie­s, repeated previous statements that the Trump administra­tion would seek to deny so-called sanctuary cities some federal grant funds. He offered no new policies, simply reiteratin­g an Obama administra­tion directive from the previous summer. But he did so with stark rhetoric intended to resonate with fellow advocates of aggressive moves to target illegal immigratio­n.

“Countless Americans would be alive today and countless loved ones would not be grieving today if these policies of sanctuary cities were ended,” Sessions claimed.

His statement was the most visible sign of how the White House hopes to regain its footing after the collapse of its health care bill — returning to the types of largely symbolic gestures on campaign promises that were a staple of its early weeks.

In his first full week in office, Trump used executive authority to target a slew of Obama priorities, seeking to restart constructi­on of oil pipelines, review new overtime pay rules and formally break from the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnershi­p. Many of those orders did not actually change policies, but did highlight issues Trump’s voters care about.

On Monday, Trump was back at it — rescinding Obama-era regulation­s through a 1996 law that sought to give Congress an effective veto of executive directives.

The Congressio­nal Review Act had been used just once before Trump took office; he signed four at once, addressing regulation­s on government contractin­g, developmen­t on public lands and education that the White House said hurt the economy and further centralize­d power in Washington.

“This was a lot of work for a lot of people to get this done, but it’s going to lead to a lot of good jobs and a lot less regulation,” Trump said at a signing ceremony attended by Republican lawmakers.

Only days earlier, a more somber president admitted that enacting more farreachin­g legislatio­n was a much heavier lift. A threeweek sprint to pass the first major plank of his legislativ­e agenda ended with GOP leaders calling off a vote on the American Health Care Act, the longpromis­ed mechanism for repealing and replacing the health care law known as Obamacare.

The White House on Monday still had little appetite for dwelling on that setback, setting it aside as it recalibrat­es strategy on an equally daunting task: a rewrite of the federal tax code.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer only tentativel­y stood by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s previously stated August target date for legislatio­n.

But the highest-profile symbolic move came from Sessions.

He noted that any jurisdicti­on applying for grants from his department would have to certify that it was in compliance with federal immigratio­n law. He didn’t mention that the Justice Department has been requiring that at least since July, so police and sheriff ’s department­s that have Justice Department grants already have been asserting that they meet the requiremen­ts of federal law.

Although many cities have policies that they, or critics, characteri­ze as “sanctuary,” those policies do not necessaril­y mean they are violating the law.

Sessions did say that the Justice Department could impose additional requiremen­ts later, but announced none.

 ?? WIN MCNAMEE/GETTY ?? Attorney General Jeff Sessions criticized sanctuary cities and repeated his warning about denying federal grants.
WIN MCNAMEE/GETTY Attorney General Jeff Sessions criticized sanctuary cities and repeated his warning about denying federal grants.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States