Orlando Sentinel

Scott Maxwell: Latest telemarket­er scheme, budgets, more.

- Scott Maxwell Sentinel Columnist

Few things are more annoying than telemarket­ers.

They interrupt dinner. They peddle products you don’t want. They’re the reason you ignore calls from strange numbers. (Sorry, Mom! I forgot you got a new line.)

Telemarket­ers know this. So they’re constantly coming up with new tricks and tactics. Enter the ringless robocall. With a ringless robocall, your phone never actually rings. The recorded pitch is just left on your voicemail.

My first reaction was: Fine. If I don’t have to run to the phone, you saved me a trip.

But consumer advocates say ringless robocalls are nefarious because they can get around call-blocking restrictio­ns and cost you money and minutes when placed to cellphones.

That’s why a number of attorneys general — including those from New York, Kentucky and Massachuse­tts — are pushing to ban the practice. So where does your AG stand? Who knows? The Palm Beach Post tried to get an answer from

Pam Bondi a few weeks ago, but Bondi’s office refused to say.

I asked again this week and got no response either.

Why not at least take a stand? Well, maybe because one group that likes ringless robocalls is Bondi’s Republican Party, which has asked the Federal Communicat­ions Commission to let the practice continue.

Amusingly, the Post also noted a Naples car dealership has been using the new robocall technology, meaning you have a trifecta of the world’s least popular profession­s — telemarket­ers, politician­s and car salesmen — on the same team.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States