Scientists disagree
whether an iceberg seven times the size of New York City broke off the coast of Antarctica because of global warming.
One of the biggest icebergs ever recorded, a trillion-ton behemoth more than seven times the size of New York City, has broken off Antarctica, triggering disagreement among scientists over whether global warming is to blame.
The event, captured by satellite, happened in the past few days when the giant chunk snapped off an ice shelf.
The iceberg covers an area of roughly 2,300 square miles. Its volume is twice that of Lake Erie, according to Project MIDAS, a research group based in Britain.
It broke loose from an ice shelf that scientists had been monitoring for months as they watched a crack grow more than 120 miles long.
Scientists say global warming has caused a thinning of such shelves, but they differ on whether climate change caused the latest event.
The iceberg is considered unlikely to pose any threat to shipping. Scientists said it probably will break up and its pieces will circle Antarctica for years or decades rather than drift into shipping lanes.
The iceberg contains so much mass that if all of it were added to the ocean, it would drive almost 3 millimeters of global sea level rise.
Since the ice was already floating, however, the breakup won’t raise sea levels in the short term, the project said in a statement.
But it removed more than 10 percent of the ice shelf, and if that hastens the flow of glaciers behind it into the water, there could be a “very modest” rise in sea level, the project said.
Two other Antarctic ice shelves, farther north on the Antarctic Peninsula, collapsed in 1995 and 2002. That sped up the slide of glaciers, which contributed to sea-level rise, David Vaughan, director of science at the British Antarctic Survey, said in a statement.
“Our glaciologists will now be watching closely to see whether the remaining Larsen C ice shelf becomes less stable than before the iceberg broke free,” he said.
Eric Rignot, a glaciologist at the University of California, Irvine, said the breaking off from the iceberg “is part of a long-term major loss of the ice shelves in the peninsula, progressing southbound and resulting from climate warming.”
But Swansea University glaciologist Martin O’Leary, a member of the MIDAS project, called it “a natural event, and we’re not aware of any link to human-induced climate change.”
A spokeswoman for the British Antarctic survey said there’s not enough information to say whether the break is an effect of climate change, though there’s good evidence global warming has caused thinning of the ice shelf.