Orlando Sentinel

Talking heads then, now: How TV has changed

- By Llewellyn King

Guess you’ve noticed: There are no politician­s on the politicsob­sessed cable news channels. Instead, there are journalist­s talking about politician­s and politics; rafts of journalist­s organized into “panels” to comment, in seconds, on events.

Twenty years ago, it was different. So much so that I started a television program with the avowed intention of letting the public see who was writing the political news in the newspapers. We are still on the air, but with fewer journalist­s commenting.

In that seemingly distant time (which was, in reality, not very long ago), the principal political talk shows were “The McLaughlin Group,” under the pioneering John McLaughlin; “Inside Washington,” formerly “Agronsky & Company,” with Gordon Peterson; and the long-lived “Washington Week in Review” with Ken Bode.

They were weekly, half-hour programs, and mine, “White House Chronicle,” joined the roster as a distant “also ran.” We aimed at introducin­g print journalist­s to a TV audience. Other programs had set round tables that included Tribune Media’s Clarence Page, because he was a delight to work with — as we found on our program — and because he was informed and entertaini­ng.

Women were fewer, and they were led by Elizabeth Drew of The New Yorker, Eleanor Clift of Newsweek, Cokie Roberts of NPR, and syndicated columnist Georgie Anne Geyer.

Cable news meant CNN, then still trying to be magisteria­l.

Fast-forward and television is chock-full of journalist­s talking about the news in what is now a staple of cable television; and rather than occupying half an hour a week, these “panels,” as the hosts call them, are on pretty well 24-7.

The New York Times publishes under the slogan “All the News That’s Fit to Print.” On television, it’s all the news that can be talked about — and they do, endlessly. I think that is pretty entertaini­ng and most of the talking heads seem to have really good sources; they are on the news — all the politics that can be talked about. It is the fat and sugar diet of TV.

What is missing are the subjects. Few members of Congress, with the exception of the leaders, are seen or talked about by name on television. They have been cleared from the television politics smorgasbor­d. Even the talking heads do not name them. The ubiquitous panelists talk about “my sources” or “a conservati­ve congressma­n” or “a Democratic member.” No names. No faces.

There are reasons aplenty for this. One, now that there is more party discipline, except for people like Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, it is known what the party line will be: It is there in the talking points — and that makes for little news and boring television.

Another is that while journalist­s go for instant analysis, a cable-television staple, politician­s are scared of “stepping in it.” Search technology is so fearsome now that almost anything any politician says can be retrieved and put on the screen. That is fodder for future “gotcha” moments. The late Tim Russert of “Meet the Press” was a master of this. “In 2003, you said” and there it was, right on the screen, the politico making a regrettabl­e remark.

Also, there is always the question of what the public wants (ratings to the TV industry). The public appears to be more interested in journalist­s debunking political leaders than the nuts and bolts of legislatio­n or even what is happening in, say, science or the rest of the world. Salt and fat gets the eyeballs.

The late Arnaud de Borchgrave lamented that in his day, aspiring reporters longed to be foreign correspond­ents; now they yearn to cover Capitol Hill and the White House. Ralph Nader — who was once a prized “get” in the parlance of television bookers — has just issued a paper regretting the dominance of political chatter in the news space. Maybe he will be asked to talk about it on television, but it is unlikely.

On the upside, there are some awesome new talents, and more women in the Washington journalist­ic firmament — even if some of us like it when journalist­s, in the words of radio veteran Dan Raviv, just set out to “find out what’s happening and tell people.”

No salt, no fat, just the facts.

 ?? FILE/PBS ?? John McLaughlin, left, and Clarence Page.
FILE/PBS John McLaughlin, left, and Clarence Page.
 ??  ?? Llewellyn King is executive producer and host of “White House Chronicle” on PBS.
Llewellyn King is executive producer and host of “White House Chronicle” on PBS.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States