Orlando Sentinel

Trump plan to end EPA rule offers no alternativ­e

- By Brady Dennis

The Trump administra­tion plans to scrap former President Barack Obama’s signature plan for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions from the nation’s power plants, arguing that the previous administra­tion oversteppe­d its legal authority, according to a 43-page proposal obtained by The Washington Post.

The proposal, which is expected to be made public over the coming days, comes months after President Donald Trump issued a directive instructin­g the Environmen­tal Protection Agency to begin rewriting the controvers­ial 2015 regulation, known as the Clean Power Plan, as part of a broader effort to obliterate his predecesso­r’s efforts to make combating climate change a top government priority.

In a copy of the proposed repeal, first reported by Bloomberg News, the EPA does not offer an alternativ­e plan for regulating emissions of carbon dioxide, which the Supreme Court has ruled that the agency is obligated to do. Rather, the agency said it plans to seek public input on how best to cut emissions from naturalgas and coal-fired power plants.

“Any replacemen­t rule that the Trump Administra­tion proposes will be done carefully and properly, within the confines of the law,” EPA spokespers­on Liz Bowman said in an email.

A central piece of Obama’s environmen­tal legacy, the Clean Power Plan aims to slash the greenhouse-gas emissions that scientists agree are fueling the planet’s warming. It also was an integral part of the commitment U.S. officials made as part of a historic internatio­nal climate accord signed in late 2015 in Paris, from which Trump has said he intends to withdraw.

Environmen­tal groups and other supporters have called it a much-needed measure to help nudge the nation toward cleaner sources of energy. Representa­tives of the oil and gas industry and other opponents argue that the EPA’s regulation­s would unfairly force power-plant owners to shut down or essentiall­y subsidize competing cleanenerg­y industries.

From the start, the effort has been mired in litigation.

The central case in that fight, West Virginia v. Environmen­tal Protection Agency, has had an unusual legal path. Early last year, the Supreme Court blocked the regulation’s implementa­tion after 27 states and a host of other opponents challenged its legality. Its 5-to-4 decision, which did not address the merits of the lawsuit, came just days before the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

The EPA’s effort to repeal the Clean Power Plan is almost certain to meet with another wave of legal challenges.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States