Orlando Sentinel

White House demands imperil ‘Dreamers’ deal

Immigratio­n law changes, border wall among proposals

- By Noah Bierman and Lisa Mascaro

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion revealed a sweeping set of hard-line immigratio­n demands Sunday night — including the building of a wall on the Southern border and major changes to the legal immigratio­n system — as tradeoffs for legislatio­n to protect the so-called Dreamers, a move that could kill prospects for a deal to protect roughly 700,000 young people now facing possible deportatio­n.

The White House proposals would curb the ability of American citizens to sponsor family members to join them from abroad, upending decades of immigratio­n policy, and put strict new limits on asylum claims. The list also includes increased money for border security and mandatory use of the government’s E-Verify system for employers to ensure that workers they hire are legal residents.

Also on the list is a tighter crackdown on socalled sanctuary cities, localities that decline to cooperate fully with federal immigratio­n authoritie­s. The list also included measures to more quickly remove minors who have crossed into the U.S. from Central America in recent years seeking asylum.

The proposal would reduce the number of permanent resident visas issued, lower the number of refugees accepted, restrict family-based green cards to spouses and minor children and create a pointbased system for legal immigratio­n. Administra­tion officials would not say how much legal immigratio­n would be reduced under the plan, but the impact would clearly be significan­t.

Democrats quickly denounced the proposals, saying they did not come close to what President Donald Trump and congressio­nal Democratic leaders had discussed last month at the White House when they struck a tentative deal for legislatio­n to protect young people who arrived in the U.S. illegally when they were children.

“This list goes so far beyond what is reasonable. This proposal fails to represent any attempt at compromise,” Democratic leaders Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California and Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York said in a statement. The wall, specifical­ly, was off the table, Schumer and Pelosi have said.

Trump announced last month that he would end the Obama administra­tion’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that provided a temporary legal status for the young immigrants, meaning that starting March 5, when the program expires, tens of thousands of them each week will face losing their jobs and possibly being deported.

Ever since Trump announced that he and “Chuck and Nancy” had discussed a possible legislativ­e deal to protect the young immigrants, hardline elements of his administra­tion have worked with immigratio­n restrictio­nists in Congress to derail the effort. The demands released Sunday reflected a wish list of their proposals, many of which are not only opposed by Democrats, but go beyond what a majority of congressio­nal Republican­s would back. If Trump insists on each of the proposals, the move would likely kill any prospect of legislatio­n.

Whether the proposals truly reflect Trump’s views, however, remains uncertain — he advocated immigratio­n restrictio­ns during his campaign, but also repeatedly has said that he does not want to see the “Dreamers” deported.

Several critics of the White House plan emphasized Sunday the hope that the proposals reflected only the views of advisers such as White House domestic policy chief Stephen Miller and Attorney General Jeff Sessions and that Trump would eventually back away from them.

 ?? AARON P. BERNSTEIN/GETTY ?? “This list goes so far beyond what is reasonable,” said Nancy Pelosi, left, and Chuck Schumer, behind lectern.
AARON P. BERNSTEIN/GETTY “This list goes so far beyond what is reasonable,” said Nancy Pelosi, left, and Chuck Schumer, behind lectern.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States