GOP lawmakers scramble to lock up the votes need to approve a tax bill that can make it to President Donald Trump’s desk by the end of the year.
Republican lawmakers are scrambling to lock up the votes they need to approve a tax bill that can make it to President Donald Trump’s desk by the end of the year, days before the Senate prepares to debate its version.
“I hope we can get it done by Christmas,” Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.” “If not, we’ll be here through Christmas, looking at the end of the year.”
Republican leaders in the Senate plan a make-orbreak floor vote on their bill as soon as Nov. 30. Democrats are expected to try to delay or derail the measure, and Republicans must hold together at least 50 votes from their thin 52-vote majority in order to prevail.
Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said on CNN’s “State of the Union” that he thinks Republicans will have the votes.
“What they are concerned about is that the personal tax cuts expire in 2025, and that’s a bit of a gimmick. But we will get there, because failure is not an option when it comes to the Republican Party cutting taxes,” Graham said.
The House passed tax legislation earlier this month over the objections of Democrats and some Republicans from high-tax states such as New York and California, who were concerned about the potential end to federal deductions for most state and local taxes.
The Senate bill would end the so-called SALT write-offs, and the House bill would repeal deductions for state and local income taxes while preserving the deduction for property taxes.
Rep. Peter King, a Republican from New York’s Long Island, bemoaned the threat to SALT deductions. “I can see a mass exodus coming,” King said on Fox’s “Sunday Morning Futures” of his recent talks with business people in his district. “They are talking about moving their address to North Carolina, Florida, wherever.”
If the Senate measure passes, lawmakers in both chambers would have to hammer out a compromise between their differing bills, a process that presents potential pitfalls of its own. For now, though, much of the Senate’s attention will focus on its legislation’s price tag.
Independent studies have found that the tax cuts won’t generate enough additional economic growth to pay for themselves. Both the Senate and House bills would reduce federal revenue over a decade by roughly $1.4 trillion, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, or JCT.
Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., a member of the Senate Finance Committee, pushed back on forecasts for a deficit blowout. A small uptick in economic growth “would cover the cost” of the tax cuts, Thune said on “Fox News Sunday.” “All you have to do is get four-tenths of 1 percent of additional GDP.”
On Wednesday, a report from the Penn Wharton Budget Model at the University of Pennsylvania said the Senate bill would cut federal revenue in each year from 2028 to 2033. That finding would mean it doesn’t comply with a key budget rule that Senate Republican leaders want to use to pass their bill with a simple majority over Democrats’ objections.
In essence, that rule holds that any bill approved via the fast-track process can’t add to the deficit outside a 10-year budget window. The JCT has found that the Senate bill would generate a surplus in its 10th year because it has set several tax breaks for businesses and individuals to expire.
But the JCT hasn’t yet weighed in publicly on the revenue effects in subsequent years. Senate Republican leaders have expressed confidence that their proposal ultimately will satisfy the rule.
Trump is scheduled to address Senate Republicans at their weekly luncheon Tuesday on taxes and the legislative agenda for the rest of the year, according to a statement from Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso. The White House previously announced that the president would talk with congressional leaders at the White House the same day about an agreement on spending to keep the government open after funding expires on Dec. 8.
Meanwhile, the Affordable Care Act looms in the background. The law contains a provision requiring individuals to buy health insurance or pay a federal penalty. Removing that penalty in 2019 would generate an estimated $318 billion in savings by 2027, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The mandate repeal wasn’t part of the House bill and would have to be hashed out in a HouseSenate conference. Rep. Kevin Brady, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, said Sunday there’s “sympathy” to the concept among members.