Science reveals the answer to the Yeti mystery: bears

turned out to be from a dog.

“I think the taxidermist went a little crazy on that one,” said Charlotte Lindqvist, who led the work.

She studies bear genomics at the State University of New York at Buffalo.

Lindqvist’s results contradict a 2014 study by Bryan Sykes, a human geneticist at Oxford, that claimed to find a genetic match between two supposed Yeti samples and an ancient polar bear that lived tens of thousands of years ago.

At the time, Sykes speculated that the creature known as a Yeti might be an unknown subspecies of brown bear in the high Himalayas that descended from an ancestor of the polar bear.

Lindqvist said her more thorough DNA analysis shows that the Yeti specimens all match with bear subspecies known to live in the area.

“It was a very short stretch of the mitochondrial genome that he used — too short to say anything conclusive,” she said. “All he really had evidence of was that the specimens had something to do with bears.”

Sykes and Lindqvst were asked to research the science behind the Yeti myth by the British television production company Icon Films.

Sykes’ work was shown on a series called “The Bigfoot Files.” Lindqvst’s subsequent research was featured on the 2016 Animal Planet special “Yeti or Not.”

“I’m a biologist and bear geneticist, and certainly Yetis have never really been on my radar at all from scientific perspective,” Lindqvst said.

Still, when Icon Films came calling, she was happy to sign on to the project because she wanted to learn more about the genetic diversity of the bears in this remote region of the world.

Over the course of a year and a half Lindqvst analyzed the genetic sequence from 24 specimens, including 12 scat samples from Himalayan brown bears collected from Khunjerab National Park in northern Pakistan.