Orlando Sentinel

The Trump

Change seen as burden by critics, likely to shrink rolls

- By Noam N. Levey Washington Bureau noah.bierman@latimes.com

administra­tion clears the way for states to impose work requiremen­ts on many Americans who depend on Medicaid, the government health insurance program for the poor.

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion cleared the way Thursday for states to impose work requiremen­ts on many Americans who depend on Medicaid, the mammoth government health insurance program for the poor.

The long-expected move — which was strongly condemned by patient advocates, physicians and consumer groups — would mark the first time in the program’s half-century history that the government will require people to work in exchange for health coverage. In states that decide to impose the new requiremen­t, it is widely expected to shrink Medicaid rolls.

The new plan sets the stage for a potentiall­y long and contentiou­s legal battle over the shape and purpose of a health program that more than 70 million Americans now depend on.

The administra­tion outlined the work-requiremen­t plan in a letter to state Medicaid officials that indicates the administra­tion’s willingnes­s to grant state requests to impose requiremen­ts on working-age, nondisable­d Medicaid beneficiar­ies.

“Medicaid needs to be more flexible so that states can best address the needs of this population,” said Seema Verma, who oversees the Medicare and Medicaid programs at the Department of Health and Human Services and has long called for putting new requiremen­ts on Medicaid patients, including charging them more for their care.

Many patient advocates note that a small fraction of the people covered by Medicaid are of working age, non-disabled and currently unemployed. The main impact of the rules will be to subject poor people to stacks of paperwork that will drive some to drop coverage, the critics say.

“Medicaid was designed as a health care program, to provide vulnerable members of our society with access to care they badly need,” said Dr. Jack Ende, president of the American College of Physicians.

“Work requiremen­ts impose an additional, unnecessar­y barrier to allowing patients access to vital health care services for people who need access and coverage the most. … We need to work together to find ways to improve the program, instead of restrict it.”

Other groups criticizin­g the Trump administra­tion’s plans included Public Citizen, Families USA and the advocacy arm of the American Cancer Society.

Several experts noted that threatenin­g to strip coverage from poor people who are not working is inconsiste­nt with the program’s legal mission to improve health and therefore could be subject to challenge in court.

The administra­tion is nonetheles­s expected to quickly approve requests from as many as 10 states, all but one of which has a Republican governor.

The states are: Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin.

Many other states are not expected to impose work requiremen­ts.

Verma and other conservati­ves argue that forcing working-age Medicaid beneficiar­ies to work or seek work — a strategy used for years in other federally funded aid programs for the poor — will improve their health.

“States … want more flexibilit­y to engage their working-age, able-bodied citizens on Medicaid,” Verma told a gathering of state Medicaid directors in November. “They want to develop programs that will help them break the chains of poverty and live up to their fullest potential. We support this.”

Critics of the Trump administra­tion’s approach note that a growing body of evidence shows that Medicaid health coverage is helping many Americans improve their health and their finances, not holding them back, as Verma and other have suggested.

A large majority of Medicaid recipients — almost two-thirds — are children, elderly or disabled. They will be exempt from the new requiremen­ts.

According to a recent analysis by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation, 6 in 10 of the nearly 25 million working-age, non-disabled adults on Medicaid are already working full-time or part-time.

Of the remaining 10 million unemployed Medicaid enrollees, more than a third had an illness that prevented them from working, about another third were taking care of a family member, 15 percent were in school, 9 percent were retired, and 6 percent said they couldn’t find work.

Trump administra­tion officials said Wednesday they would ensure that Medicaid enrollees in states with a work requiremen­t would still get covered if they are involved in a “community engagement” activity, such as taking care of a family member, seeking work or job training.

 ?? JAHI CHIKWENDIU/WASHINGTON POST 2015 ?? Former coal miner Gary Ryan, of Kentucky, gets a checkup. Kentucky is one of the states that requested the ability to require non-disabled, adult Medicaid recipients to work.
JAHI CHIKWENDIU/WASHINGTON POST 2015 Former coal miner Gary Ryan, of Kentucky, gets a checkup. Kentucky is one of the states that requested the ability to require non-disabled, adult Medicaid recipients to work.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States