Orlando Sentinel

CIA reports expose graphic interrogat­ions

CIA chief Haspel led Thailand black site at the time

- By Chris Megerian chris.megerian@latimes.com

WASHINGTON — Newly unclassifi­ed CIA documents provide fresh details on the brutal treatment of a terrorism suspect in late 2002 at a secret prison in rural Thailand then run by Gina Haspel, who was confirmed in May as CIA director after a contentiou­s Senate hearing.

The 16 redacted cables between CIA headquarte­rs in Virginia and the so-called black site prison in Thailand, which the National Security Archive at George Washington University obtained through a Freedom of Informatio­n Act lawsuit, describe extended sessions of physical violence, forced nudity, sleep deprivatio­n, box confinemen­t and waterboard­ing of an al-Qaida suspect.

The cables don’t dramatical­ly change the understand­ing of what the CIA called enhanced interrogat­ion techniques and critics called torture at a nowshutter­ed network of secret detention sites overseas.

But they do provide more graphic details of what happened when Haspel was in charge of an interrogat­ion site the CIA had code named “Green.”

One cable, dated Dec. 1, 2002, is especially vivid.

It says an interrogat­or “strode, catlike, into the well-lit confines of the cell at 0902 hrs (redacted), deftly removed the subject’s black hood with a swipe, paused, and in a deep, measured voice said that subject — having ‘calmed down’ after his (staged) run-in with his hulking, heavily muscled guards the previous day — should reveal what subject had done to vex his guards to the point of rage.”

The CIA had refused to release the material during Haspel’s Senate confirmati­on hearing, but the Archive posted them online Friday.

The cables all focus on the interrogat­ion of Abd al Rahim al Nashiri, a Saudi citizen suspected of helping to orchestrat­e the 2000 bombing of the U.S. destroyer Cole in a Yemeni port, killing 17 U.S. sailors. Now imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, he was captured in Dubai in October 2002 and transporte­d to the Thailand prison in mid-November, where he was interrogat­ed for three weeks.

According to one cable, the “aggressive interrogat­ion phase” began at 4:15 a.m. one day. “Subject was warned not to lie, and was told that if he lied, he would suffer the consequenc­es, and his life would become infinitely worse,” the cable said.

The Sept. 11 attacks were barely a year old, and interrogat­ors demanded informatio­n about future terrorist strikes. When Nashiri did not immediatel­y respond, “subject’s clothes were ripped off of him by security team members while the interrogat­or told subject we knew he was lying,” the cable said.

As interrogat­ors demanded answers, “subject whimpered that he would do anything the interrogat­ors wanted.”

The episode ended when one of the interrogat­ors pointed at a “large box” in the room and told Nashiri, “It was now his new home.” He was then hooded and locked in the coffin-sized box for about 12 hours.

The harsh treatment continued for days, sometimes lasting for hours. Interrogat­ors repeatedly “walled” Nashiri, meaning they slammed him into a wall, or locked him inside an even smaller box.

After several days, “subject was told that he was going to suffer,” and interrogat­ors began to waterboard him, a painful and terrifying technique that involves forcing water down a prisoner’s throat to simulate drowning. In all, he was waterboard­ed three times.

When strapped to the table, Nashiri began to cry and he “promised to tell everything he knew, but added that he knew nothing.” Interrogat­ors continued “the water treatment,” the cable said, and left Nashiri on the table, “moaning, shaking and asking God to help him repeatedly.”

There’s no indication that Nashiri provided useful intelligen­ce about future plots. A report from Democrats on the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee released in 2014 said the brutal interrogat­ions did not help prevent imminent terrorist attacks, and they sometimes led to false confession­s as suspects desperatel­y sought to stop the abuse.

Haspel’s name does not appear in the redacted cables.

But Tom Blanton, the director of the National Security Archive, said Haspel would have authored them or authorized their transmissi­on while serving as chief of base.

The CIA has never publicly confirmed that Haspel supervised the Thailand black site while Nashiri was interrogat­ed there, nor has it officially confirmed the existence of the secret prison. It was closed in December 2002.

 ?? CHIP SOMODEVILL­A/GETTY ?? The CIA had refused to release the material that details treatment of a terrorism suspect in Gina Haspel’s Senate confirmati­on hearing, but the Archive posted them online Friday.
CHIP SOMODEVILL­A/GETTY The CIA had refused to release the material that details treatment of a terrorism suspect in Gina Haspel’s Senate confirmati­on hearing, but the Archive posted them online Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States