Orlando Sentinel

Insurance rules hurt the hurting

Access to pricier drugs cut for those who need but can least afford them

- By Linda A. Johnson

TRENTON, N.J. — For Bridgett Snelten, changing her health insurance meant enduring wild blood sugar swings, bouts of vomiting and weight gain.

The Sandy, Utah, mother of two girls has diabetes and has had to change health insurance plans three years in a row. Twice, new insurers wouldn’t cover Trulicity, a once-a-week injected diabetes medicine she’d been taking that helped control her blood sugar tightly. Instead, they made her return to an inexpensiv­e, twice-aday injected diabetes drug she and her doctor knew didn’t work for her.

Each time, blood sugar plunges caused the shakes, vomiting and other symptoms until her doctor finally persuaded the new insurer to approve Trulicity, which retails for more than $700 per month.

“It was almost a whole year of hell just trying to get on the right medication” the last time, recalls Snelten, 43. “Who are they to say more than my doctor what’s right for me?”

More and more, patients such as Snelten are being caught up in efforts to rein in the cost of health care — efforts employers and patients desperatel­y want to succeed.

But the strategies also can restrict access to the newest, most expensive drugs even for those who need them.

“We are in a sense entering a two-tiered system because there are individual­s who can make it happen and just write a check” for a hefty drug copayment, says cardiologi­st Dr. Elizabeth Klodas in Edina, Minn. “Others are not able.”

Some of the insurance policy provisions long have been used, but they are becoming including:

Patients generally must pay up to 30 percent of the cost of pricey drugs, not a fixed “co-pay.” That means patients who need expensive drugs can face huge bills until they hit their more common, plan’s

Patients and doctors must get permission in advance to use some drugs, something called prior authorizat­ion, which can take weeks or months.

Some patients, including out-of-pocket maximum. Snelten, have to go through what’s called “step therapy.” Patients must try cheaper medicines first before they are allowed to move on to newer, costlier drugs. Sometimes, a patient’s health deteriorat­es in the meantime.

Starting next year, Medicare Advantage plans, which are used by about 20 million Americans over 65, will be allowed to implement step therapy provisions.

In a survey last year by the doctors’ networking site SERMO, 64 percent of the 3,050 U.S. respondent­s said at least once a month an insurer rejected what they’d prescribed, even after a patient had failed step therapy.

“Anything that’s a barrier decreases the chance that the doctor will prescribe it and the patient will get it,” says former American College of Cardiology president Dr. Mary Norine Walsh, head of advanced heart failure treatment at St. Vincent Heart Center in Indianapo- lis.Nearly 80 percent of family doctors and specialist­s surveyed by the American Medical Associatio­n last year said patients “often” or “sometimes” abandon their recommende­d treatment if their insurer won’t cover it. Ninety-two percent said the red tape associated with getting drugs covered harms patients’ health.

Dr. Stephen Kopecky, a cardiologi­st who focuses on prevention at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., said one recent appeal for approval for a type of new cholestero­l drug went on so long that his patient had to have a stent implanted in a blood vessel before she finally got approval. He thinks the drug could have prevented the procedure.

Kopecky says another patient needing the same drug only won approval after giving her insurer 23 types of medical informatio­n, including receipts proving she’d taken inexpensiv­e cholestero­l-lowering statin pills for 10 years without enough improvemen­t.

“It sometimes takes weeks, if not months, of submitting prescripti­ons, rewriting prescripti­ons, appealing, rebuttals,” he says.

The reason: Generic cholestero­l drugs that work well for most people cost pennies a day. The newer drugs, Repatha and Praluent, can retail for more than $14,000 a year.

“I understand insurers balking,” Klodas says. But even when they approve expensive drugs, copayments can be so high, “Patients say, ‘I can’t do that.’ ”

That can leave with a tricky call.

“There are situations where we have to change treatment plans because of cost,” says Dr. Yousuf Zafar, a gastrointe­stinal cancer specialist at the Duke Cancer Institute in North Carolina. “I’ve had a handful of patients where cost is so overwhelmi­ng they opted for no treatment.” doctors

 ?? RICK BOWMER/AP PHOTOS ?? Bridgett Snelten, a diabetic mother of two, including Bella, above, has had to change insurance plans three years in a row.
RICK BOWMER/AP PHOTOS Bridgett Snelten, a diabetic mother of two, including Bella, above, has had to change insurance plans three years in a row.
 ??  ?? Snelten, seen here with her prescripti­ons, was made to switch to a cheaper but less effective drug by two insurers.
Snelten, seen here with her prescripti­ons, was made to switch to a cheaper but less effective drug by two insurers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States