Orlando Sentinel

Trump moves to end asylum at the border

New rule would block claims, to face challenge in court

- By Colleen Long

WASHINGTON — Reversing decades of U.S. policy, the Trump administra­tion said Monday that it will end all asylum protection­s for most migrants who arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border — the president’s most forceful attempt to block asylum claims and slash the number of people seeking refuge in America.

The new rule, expected to go into effect Tuesday, would cover countless would-be refugees, many of them fleeing violence and poverty in Central America. It is certain to face legal challenges.

According to the plan published in the Federal Register, migrants who pass through another country — in this case, Mexico — on their way to the U.S. will be ineligible for asylum. The rule also applies to children who have crossed the border alone.

The vast majority of people affected by the rule are from Central America. But sometimes migrants from Africa, Cuba or Haiti and other countries try to come through the U.S.-Mexico border, as well.

There are some exceptions, including for victims of human traffickin­g and asylum-seekers who were denied protection in another country. If the country the migrant passed through did not sign one of the major internatio­nal treaties governing how refugees are managed (though most Western countries signed them) a migrant could still apply for U.S. asylum.

Mexican Foreign Relations Secretary Marcelo Ebrard said Monday that his country “does not agree with any measure that limits access to asylum.”

Mexico’s asylum system is also overwhelme­d.

Trump administra­tion officials say the changes are meant to close the gap between the initial asylum screening that most people pass and the final decision on asylum that most people do not win.

Attorney General William Barr said that the United States is “a generous country but is being completely overwhelme­d” by the burdens associated with apprehendi­ng and processing hundreds of thousands of migrants at the southern border.

But immigrant rights groups, religious leaders and humanitari­an groups have said the Republican administra­tion’s policies amount to a cruel effort to keep immigrants out of the country.

“This is yet another move to turn refugees with wellfounde­d fears of persecutio­n back to places where their lives are in danger — in fact the rule would deny asylum to refugees who do not apply for asylum in countries where they are in peril,” said Eleanor Acer of Human Rights First.

ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, who has litigated some of the major challenges to the Trump administra­tion’s immigratio­n policies, said the rule was unlawful and the group planned to sue.

“The rule, if upheld, would effectivel­y eliminate asylum for those at the southern border,” he said. “But it is patently unlawful.”

U.S. law allows refugees to request asylum when they arrive at the U.S. regardless of how they arrive or cross. The crucial exception is for those who have come through a country considered to be “safe,” but the Immigratio­n and Nationalit­y Act, which governs asylum law, is vague on how a country is determined safe. It says pursuant to a bilateral or multilater­al agreement.”

Right now, the U.S. has such an agreement, known as a “safe third country,” only with Canada.

Mexico and Central American countries have been considerin­g a regional compact on the issue, but nothing has been decided. Guatemalan officials were expected in Washington on Monday, but apparently a meeting between Trump and Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales was canceled amid a court challenge in Guatemala over whether the country could agree to a safe-country agreement with the U.S.

The new rule also will apply to the initial asylum screening, known as a “credible fear” interview, at which migrants must prove they have credible fears of returning to their home country. It applies to migrants who are arriving to the U.S., not those who are already in the country.

Acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan said additional funding given by Congress for aid at the U.S.-Mexico border isn’t enough.

“Until Congress can act, this interim rule will help reduce a major ‘pull’ factor driving irregular migration to the United States.”

Along with the administra­tion’s recent effort to send asylum-seekers back over the border, Trump has tried to deny asylum to anyone crossing the border illegally and restrict who can claim asylum, and the attorney general recently tried to keep thousands of asylumseek­ers detained while their cases play out.

Nearly all of those efforts have been blocked by courts.

 ?? PAUL RATJE/GETTY-AFP ?? The new rule would block almost everyone who crosses the southern border after passing through Mexico from seeking asylum. The ACLU plans to challenge the rule in court.
PAUL RATJE/GETTY-AFP The new rule would block almost everyone who crosses the southern border after passing through Mexico from seeking asylum. The ACLU plans to challenge the rule in court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States