CIA unit of hackers didn’t protect tools it developed
Internal report details worst data loss at agency
WASHINGTON — A specialized CIA unit that developed sophisticated hacking tools and cyber weapons didn’t do enough to protect its own operations and wasn’t prepared to adequately respond when the secrets were stolen, according to an internal report prepared after the worst data loss in the intelligence agency’s history.
“These shortcomings were emblematic of a culture that evolved over years that too often prioritized creativity and collaboration at the expense of security,” according to the report, which raises questions about cybersecurity practices inside U.S. intelligence agencies.
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., a senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, obtained the redacted report from the Justice Department after it was introduced as evidence in a court case this year involving the stolen CIA hacking tools.
He released it Tuesday along with a letter he wrote to new national intelligence director John Ratcliffe, asking him to explain what steps he’s taking to protect the nation’s secrets held by federal intelligence agencies.
The 2017 report, whose findings were first reported by The Washington Post, examined the theft one year earlier of sensitive cyber tools the CIA had developed to hack into the networks of adversaries.
WikiLeaks had announced months earlier that it had obtained tools created by the CIA’s specialized Center for Cyber Intelligence, and the anti-secrecy website published comprehensive descriptions of 35 of them, according to the report.
The report describes the spring 2016 theft as the largest data loss in agency history — compromising at least 180 gigabytes to as much as 34 terabytes of information.
The agency did not realize the loss had occurred until the WikiLeaks announcement a year later, the report said, and identified as a prime suspect a CIA software engineer who officials said had copied the hacking arsenal without raising suspicion.
The former employee, Joshua Schulte, was charged by the Justice Department with stealing the material and providing it to WikiLeaks.
But a jury deadlocked on those charges and convicted him in March of more minor charges after a trial in Manhattan.
The CIA report revealed lax cybersecurity measures by the specialized unit and the niche information technology systems that it relies upon, which is separate from the systems more broadly used by everyday agency employees.
The report says that because the stolen data was on a system that lacked user activity monitoring, it was not detected until when WikiLeaks announced it in March 2017.
“Had the data been stolen for the benefit of a state adversary and not published, we might still be unaware of the loss—as would be true for the vast majority of data on Agency mission systems,” the report says.
The report, prepared in October 2017 by the CIA’s WikiLeaks Task Force, suggests the CIA should have been better prepared in light of devastating information compromises at other agencies.
The hacking tools compromise occurred almost three years after Edward Snowden, a former contractor for the National Security Agency, confiscated classified information about the NSA’s surveillance operations, and disclosed it.
“CIA has moved too slowly to put in place the safeguards that we knew were necessary given successive breaches to other U.S. Government agencies,” the report said.
Among the problems the report identified: sensitive cyber weapons were not compartmented, passwords were shared and users had indefinite access to historical data.
CIA spokesman Timothy Barrett declined to comment on the report’s findings, but said the “CIA works to incorporate bestin-class technologies to keep ahead of and defend against ever-evolving threats.”
Sean Roche, former associate deputy director of digital innovation at the CIA, who testified at the Schulte trial, said that although the CIA did have a problem with one of its networks, “to say that the people at the CIA don’t take security seriously is not accurate. It’s completely inaccurate.”
Speaking Tuesday at a webinar hosted by the Cipher Brief, an online newsletter that focuses on intelligence, Roche likened the task force report to an after-accident report by the National Transportation Safety Board.
“This broke. This is what happened,“’ Roche said. “We need to make sure this doesn’t happen again. How is that not a healthy thing for an organization that doesn’t have a public eye into what it’s doing?”