Orlando Sentinel

Groups back ballot measure

New amendments would be tougher

- By Jason Garcia

Some of Florida’s biggest business-lobbying groups are lining up behind a controvers­ial measure on the November ballot that would make it harder to amend the Florida constituti­on.

The Florida Chamber of Commerce has endorsed the measure, which is being sponsored by a secretive nonprofit called “Keep Our Constituti­on Clean” and would require any future proposed constituti­onal amendments be approved in two separate, statewide referendum­s. So has the Florida Farm Bureau.

Earlier this month, a think tank led in part by executives from Florida Power & Light and Publix

Supermarke­ts, released a “voter guide” recommendi­ng a “yes” vote on the amendment, which will be Amendment Four on this year’s ballot. And earlier this summer, a committee of tourism industry lobbyists and executives — including a lobbyist for Universal Orlando — told members of the Florida Restaurant & Lodging Associatio­n that “help may be coming ” if the amendment passes.

“We are in support of any constituti­onal amendment or any measure that makes the process to amend the constituti­on more deliberati­ve. And that’s clearly what this does,” said Adam Basford, a lobbyist for the Farm Bureau, which represents the state’s agricultur­e industry.

On the other side of the controvers­ial amendment is a patchwork of groups — from nonpartisa­n organizati­ons like the League of Women Voters of Florida and the Florida Rights Restoratio­n Coalition to labor unions, liberal activists and organizers of previous petition drives who have used the constituti­onal amendment process in the past to get around a Republican­controlled Florida Legislatur­e.

Opponents say requiring a second statewide vote for an amendment to pass — in a state with more than 20 million people and 10 separate media markets — would impose an expensive new barrier that would deter future petition drives from even starting.

“Amendment number four is an attempt to take away the rights of citizens, and we oppose it because we believe that direct democracy belongs in the hands of citizens or citizens’ groups,”

said Jonathan Webber, the deputy director of Florida Conservati­on Voters, the environmen­tal group that led a successful campaign in 2014 for a constituti­onal amendment meant to force state lawmakers to spend more money on land conservati­on.

Some of Florida’s biggest businesses have spent decades battling petition drives — including proposals to tax the sugar industry to pay for Everglades cleanup, make it harder for developers to

build on rural land, and deregulate the electric utility industry. The tourism industry is currently campaignin­g against Amendment Two on year’s ballot, which would eventually raise the state minimum wage to $15 an hour.

For them, the Keep Our Constituti­on Clean amendment — which will appear on the ballot under the title “Voter Approval of Constituti­onal Amendments — could serve as something of a safety net. Opponents who fail to persuade voters to reject an amendment once would get a second chance.

Keep Our Constituti­on Clean itself has been shrouded in mystery since it launched more than two years ago. That’s because the leaders of the campaign organized themselves as a “dark money” nonprofit, which has allowed them to avoid disclosing their donors

As a result, even though Keep Our Constituti­on Clean Inc. has spent more than $9 million on its campaign so far, very little is known about where it gets its money — although the Orlando Sentinel reported last month that it has raised at least $150,000 from another dark money group with links to Associated Industries of Florida, a business-lobbying group whose members include Walt Disney World, Florida Power & Light and U.S. Sugar.

Businesses have financed similar campaigns in the past. In 2004, state records show an assortment of business and business-lobbying groups — from Disney and Florida Power & Light to health insurer Blue Cross Blue Shield and the Florida Home Builders Associatio­n — funded a successful campaign for a constituti­onal amendment that imposed earlier deadlines on petition drives.

Two years later, businesses and business groups underwrote another successful campaign for an amendment that required all future constituti­onal amendments to be approved by 60 percent of voters, rather than a simple majority.

And while it’s not clear who is donating money to Keep Our Constituti­on Clean, some of the business groups supporting its amendment have worked closely with the organizati­on in other arenas. Earlier this year, for instance, Keep Our Constituti­on Clean and the Florida Chamber of Commerce lobbied side-byside in the Florida Legislatur­e for a new law that adding further restrictio­ns to petition drives.

In a written statement issued through a spokeswoma­n, the state chamber, whose biggest donors include Disney, FPL and Publix, praised the Keep Our Constituti­on Clean amendment.

“Amendment 4 provides the citizens of Florida with additional time and two opportunit­ies to debate the pros and cons of any specific proposed amendment and reduces the chances that a bad idea finds its way into our most foundation­al document,” the chamber’s statement said.

 ?? AMY BETH BENNETT/SOUTH FLORIDA SUN SENTINEL ?? A caravan carrying protesting fast-food employees with the Florida for $15 coalition goes through the drive-through at McDonald’s on W. Broward Blvd. in Fort Lauderdale on Sept. 16. The protesters caravanned from a McDonald’s in Miami, calling on Floridians to vote yes on Amendment 2 which would raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour.
AMY BETH BENNETT/SOUTH FLORIDA SUN SENTINEL A caravan carrying protesting fast-food employees with the Florida for $15 coalition goes through the drive-through at McDonald’s on W. Broward Blvd. in Fort Lauderdale on Sept. 16. The protesters caravanned from a McDonald’s in Miami, calling on Floridians to vote yes on Amendment 2 which would raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States