Israel trades data to Pfizer for vaccine doses agreement
JERUSALEM — After sprinting ahead in the race to inoculate its population against the coronavirus, Israel has struck a deal with Pfizer, promising to share vast troves of medical data with the international drug giant in exchange for the continued flow of its hard-to-get vaccine.
Proponents say the deal could allow Israel to become the first country to vaccinate most of its population, while providing valuable research that could help the rest of the world.
But critics say the deal raises major ethical concerns, including possible privacy violations and a deepening of the global divide that enables wealthy countries to stockpile vaccines as poorer populations — including Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza —have to wait longer to be inoculated.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stumping ahead of the country’s March elections as Israel’s vaccinator-in-chief, said this month that he reached the deal with Pfizer’s chief executive to speed up vaccine deliveries to Israel.
“Israel will be a global model state,” he said. “Israel will share with Pfizer and with the entire world the statistical data that will help develop strategies for defeating the coronavirus.”
Israeli Health Minister Yuli Edelstein told The Associated Press that the government will turn over data to “see how it influences, first of all, the level of the disease in Israel, the possibility to open the economy, different aspects of social life, and whether there are any effects of the vaccination.”
Pfizer’s vaccine, developed with German partner BioNTech, has received emergency approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Union’s regulatory agency and is believed to provide up to 95% protection against COVID-19.
But much remains unknown, including its longterm protection and whether it can prevent transmission of the virus.
Israel, home to 9.3 million, is considered an ideal place for studying these questions. Its mandatory universal health care is provided by four publicly funded HMOs with meticulously digitized medical records. This centralized system has helped Israel administer more than 2 million doses of the vaccine in under a month. Israel has also bought doses of the Moderna and AstraZeneca vaccines.
The inoculation blitz is a matter of national pride. It also is at the center of Netanyahu’s reelection campaign as he seeks to deflect attention from his ongoing corruption trial, Israel’s deep economic crisis and the latest virus surge.
The Health Ministry has recorded over 558,000 cases since the beginning of the pandemic and more than 4,000 deaths. Israeli officials say they aim to have most of the country vaccinated by the end of March, just around election day.
But the exact quid pro quo between Israel and Pfizer is unclear, even after a redacted version of the agreement was released Sunday by the Israeli Health Ministry.
Neither Israel nor Pfizer would say how much Israel has paid for the vaccines, though Edelstein called it a “classical win-win” for both sides. Israeli media have reported that Israel paid at least 50% more than other countries. The data is reportedly being shared with the World Health Organization, but the global body did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
This month, the head of the WHO appealed to drugmakers and wealthier countries to “stop making bilateral deals,” saying they hurt aU. N.-backed effort to widen access. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus did not single out any countries or companies.
Last week, Dr. Siddhartha Datta, WHO Europe’s program manager for vaccine-preventable diseases and immunization, said the agency is trying to collect “disaggregated” data — based on age, gender, local area, employment and other factors — and reporting on any safety issues as the vaccines are deployed.
Israel had announced the acquisition of millions of vaccine doses before the Pfizer deal was announced. It’s unclear how the quantity or pace of deliveries has changed, or whether the vaccines have been diverted from other countries.
The arrangement has drawn attention to the unequal distribution of vaccines between rich and poor nations. A recent estimate from the International Rescue Committee said that the WHO’s global COVAX campaign is likely to vaccinate only 20% of the world’s lower-income countries by the end of 2021.
“This is a shady, underthe-table deal that preferences certain countries over others without any transparency,” said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. “In the end, it’s going to be lowand middle-income countries that are going to be left behind.”
Dr. Nadav Davidovitch, head of the school of public health at Israel’s Ben Gurion University and an adviser to the government on coronavirus policy, said the deal has raised troubling concerns about the deepening disparity of vaccination efforts.