Orlando Sentinel

Another appeals court district is another Florida boondoggle

- The Sun Sentinel Editorial Board consists of Editorial Page Editor Steve Bousquet, Deputy Editorial Page Editor Dan Sweeney, and Editor-in-Chief Julie Anderson. Editorials are the opinion of the Board and written by one of its members or a designee. To co

With five district courts of appeal that appear to be efficient, Florida does not need another at considerab­le burden to the taxpayers.

But that’s what the Florida Supreme Court is proposing to the Legislatur­e on the questionab­le premise that it would increase public confidence in those appeals courts.

It’s a boondoggle entailing another $50 million courthouse and ongoing salary and staff expenses of at least $1 million a year, plus endless complicati­ons for lawyers and an invitation to Gov. Ron DeSantis to put six more conservati­ve allies on the appellate bench.

If public confidence is indeed flagging, as the court supposes, it’s because of blatantly political appointmen­ts by DeSantis and his predecesso­r, Rick Scott. The sixth-district plan does nothing to fix that.

Stripped of that pretext, it’s about politics too. There are footprints.

In April, the Legislatur­e settled a power struggle over a new $50 million courthouse for the Second District Court of Appeal (DCA) by deciding to build it in Pinellas County rather than in Lakeland, the home town of Senate Appropriat­ions Chair Kelli Stargel. House Speaker Chris Sprowls, R-Palm Harbor, wanted it for his home county of Pinellas. He had the greater clout.

In an obvious nod to Stargel, however, Sprowls called it “step one in a multiyear plan to address the unique needs” of the 14 counties in the second district’s jurisdicti­on.

A month later, the Supreme Court appointed a 15-member commission to “evaluate the necessity” for making changes to the appellate districts. With only seven members concurring in the specifics, the committee recommende­d a reorganiza­tion that, among other things, carves a sixth district out of the second.

It may be pertinent that Chief Justice Charles Canady resides in Lakeland, where his wife, Jennifer Canady, is running for the Legislatur­e. The potential conflicts of interest are an issue for another day.

There was a strong dissent to the reorganiza­tion signed by four of the five DCA judges on the 15-member panel and the one public defender. The statistics the committee gathered showed that none of the five districts is overworked. In fact, virtually all caseloads have been declining since 201516, before the pandemic, and 96% of the criminal appeals and 93.6% of civil cases are concluded within 180 days of oral argument.

The Supreme Court approved the plan last week over the dissent of Justice Ricky Polston, who noted that the five chief judges in the districts oppose it and more than two-thirds of all the district judges had told the committee it would do nothing for any measure of performanc­e or public trust and confidence.

Below the appellate level, the committee proposal also calls for moving the Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval, Nassau and Clay counties) out of the First DCA into the Fifth and moving the Ninth Circuit (Orange and Osceola counties) into the Second District.

The new Sixth DCA would consist of these trial circuits: The Sixth (Pinellas and Pasco), the Twelfth (Manatee, DeSoto and Sarasota) and Thirteenth (Hillsborou­gh).

That still leaves the Second District in need of a new home.

Its mold-infested courthouse in Lakeland has been unusable since 2016. Its rented quarters at Tampa would no longer be in the district. It would also need one new judge, along with five for the enlarged Fifth District.

That obviously portends a new Lakeland courthouse for Stargel and no more commuting for her husband, John K. Stargel, whom Gov. DeSantis appointed to the court last year.

The Supreme Court’s order cites “the serious underrepre­sentation” of First District judges from the Jacksonvil­le area, which provides 29% of the district court’s workload and 37.5% of the population but only two out of 15 judges. But moving the Jacksonvil­le area into another district doesn’t guarantee that it will be better represente­d.

The real problem at the First District — unmentione­d in the order — is that a succession of governors and their nominating commission­s have packed its bench with Tallahasse­e insiders. Justice Polston accurately attributed the dearth of judges from Jacksonvil­le to “the governor’s selection, not the inability to attract well-qualified applicants.”

A closely related issue is the near-disappeara­nce of Black and Hispanic judges from the appellate bench at Tallahasse­e and statewide. According to the study committee’s own findings, all but eight of the 64 sitting district court judges are white.

The district courts are the courts of last resort for most other appeals from trial courts. Their precedents are binding within their districts unless the Supreme Court accepts a case to reconcile conflictin­g precedents.

Creating a sixth district also means that the next Supreme Court justice would have to come from that area. That’s because of a quirky residency requiremen­t that rural legislator­s exacted in 1976, when all appellate judgeships became appointed rather than elected.

An unsettled question is what would happen to the 13 Second District judges who live in what would become the Sixth District. They include some relatively liberal judges who had been appointed by earlier governors. Few remain statewide. In some quarters, the reorganiza­tion is suspected of an intent to make the Second District more conservati­ve.

The Constituti­on requires Florida judges to live in their jurisdicti­ons. In the past, the Legislatur­e has transferre­d sitting judges to new districts, as the Supreme Court appears to be encouragin­g in this instance.

The last appellate district, the Fifth, was created in 1979. In calling now for another, the Supreme Court acknowledg­ed that it “would be accompanie­d by some degree of internal disruption” but that it would be “short-lived and … outweighed by the benefit of enhanced public trust and confidence.”

It’s a stretch to imagine public confidence in such a political stew.

The Legislatur­e should reject the reorganiza­tion. That is asking much of the rank and file, given the political influence at work. But if they approve it, they should be prepared to explain why so-called conservati­ves can be rolled by such an unnecessar­y and expensive boondoggle.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States