Orlando Sentinel

Biden’s stealth plan to restore faith in democracy

- By Matthew Yglesias

President Joe Biden’s executive order directing federal agencies to improve the online user experience won’t push inflation out of the headlines or help his stalled Build Back Better proposal. But it is a good idea, and underneath all the details lies a deeper rationale: The best way for democratic states to counter domestic populism and foreign authoritar­ianism is to show that they can make government work on a day-to-day basis for ordinary people.

And the poor quality of federal digital infrastruc­ture is absolutely a good place to start. The internet, of course, was in crucial respects a product of the U.S. government itself, and the U.S. rightly prides itself as a world leader in private-sector informatio­n technology. Public-sector IT, however, is often a clunky disaster — and fixing it should be a high priority.

Unfortunat­ely, these are not problems that can be solved by executive orders alone. Biden’s ideas will help, but fixing federal IT is going to require spending money, changing rules, tackling special interests and other things that can only be done by a functional Congress. And that’s exactly what’s missing.

That said, Biden’s proposals are admirably concrete. The order promises that taxpayers will be able to receive many services online: passport renewals, tax refunds based on prior returns, Social Security and Medicare benefits, Department of Agricultur­e loans, and so on.

If it happens, it’ll be great. If it doesn’t happen, it will be a specific failure that the president is accountabl­e for — which should motivate his appointees at the agencies to get it done.

Perhaps the most significan­t idea is a bit less specific, and relates to eligibilit­y for America’s social safety net programs. These typically have eligibilit­y criteria based on household income and family size, informatio­n that often needs to be submitted and verified on a program-by-program basis. This is also informatio­n that in most cases the IRS already has. Biden promises that families will be able to “more easily enroll in federal benefits and recertify their income status more easily across programs using direct certificat­ion, a process that automatica­lly certifies income-eligible individual­s without extra paperwork, instead of managing multiple, complicate­d processes that waste time and cause frustratio­n.”

This is a potential game-changer for the neediest families in America. But it’s also easier said than done, at least on a large scale.

The American welfare state tends to be fragmented along state lines. In general this is not because some states are launching bold safety-net experiment­s while others lag behind. Instead, key federal programs — Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, unemployme­nt insurance, and the like — are designed as joint state-federal ventures with mixed sources of funding and a heavy state role in implementa­tion.

This fractured welfare state has never made much sense. And fragmentat­ion is a formidable obstacle to this vision of seamless integratio­n and cross-eligibilit­y.

Nowhere is this more visible than in a frustratin­g federal IT situation that Biden’s order is silent on: filing taxes.

The IRS knows, in most cases, exactly how much money a given household owes each year. So the most reasonable way for tax filing to work would be for the IRS to send out itemized bills outlining how much people owe, and what that means in terms of a refund or payment. Taxpayers could file an objection if they believe the IRS has gotten it wrong.

The absurdity of the current situation is the large number of people who are filing via commercial software that requires them to tediously input informatio­n the IRS already has into a program that makes a calculatio­n the IRS has already done. The persistenc­e of this system is due not to dumb bureaucrat­s or presidenti­al listlessne­ss. It exists because the IRS is prohibited by law from competing with private tax-filing software thanks to a pernicious coalition of tax-prep industry lobbyists protecting their profits and anti-tax ideologues who want to make paying taxes as annoying as possible.

This is a poisonous dynamic. More broadly, it’s the kind of maddening inefficien­cy that undermines public faith in democratic government. Unfortunat­ely, it’s not clear any big solutions are in the works. For now, though, it would be nice to have an easier way to renew your passport.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States