Orlando Sentinel

CDC endorses ‘test-to-stay’ strategy

Policy aims to keep kids in school after exposure to virus

- By Noah Weiland and Emily Anthes

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Friday that unvaccinat­ed students exposed to the coronaviru­s no longer need to miss school if they repeatedly test negative for the virus in the days after, allowing them to remain in class and school activities.

The new guidance, known as the “test to stay” protocol, would ease the burden on children who have been expected to stay home if a close contact tests positive for the virus and on parents who have had to scramble to retrieve children from school or find day care.

Although some schools and districts are already using the “test-to-stay” approach, the CDC has not previously endorsed it, citing a lack of evidence. On Friday, the agency released studies from two counties, one in California and the other in Illinois, that effectivel­y tested the test-to-stay protocol and found that it worked.

The studies were conducted before the fast-moving omicron variant began spreading in the United States. Scientists are still investigat­ing many basic questions about the variant, some of which could affect the assessment of in-school transmissi­on risks.

The policy, hinted at in the winter COVID-19 plan that President Joe Biden unveiled earlier this month, still calls on students to wear masks and socially distance, and applies only to those who remain asymptomat­ic as they test for the virus. Until now, unvaccinat­ed students were expected to quarantine at home for as long as two weeks after exposure.

Vaccinated students with exposures have generally been allowed to remain in school as long as they are asymptomat­ic and wear a mask. The CDC recommends that vaccinated people get tested five to seven days after close contact with someone who has a suspected or confirmed case of the virus.

The agency Friday released studies from the two counties that effectivel­y tested the test-to-stay protocol. In Los Angeles, students at schools that did not participat­e in the pilot program, and who had to quarantine, lost an estimated 92,455 in-person school days between Sept. 20 and Oct. 31, while students exposed to the virus in schools trying out the program lost no days. Schools that used test-to-stay also did not see increases in virus rates among students.

In Lake County, Illinois, researcher­s estimated that up to 8,152 in-person learning days were saved between August and October in schools that participat­ed in the program. Of the 16 students in the program who tested positive for the virus in the two weeks after exposure, none appeared to transmit it to others at school, the report said.

The California students were tested twice in the week after exposure; the Illinois students were tested four times.

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC director, said at a White House news conference Friday that the protocol was “promising” and “now proven.” She added that because “test to stay” was only studied in schools, the CDC did not yet have evidence about its effectiven­ess in other settings.

Public health experts cheered the move, saying it struck the right balance between keeping children safe and allowing them to continue with in-person learning.

“The test-to-stay programs are really good at balancing the costs and benefits,” said Zoe McLaren, a health policy expert at the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. She added, “What the test-tostay program does is help us keep COVID cases down, while also trying to make sure we keep kids in school as much as possible, which I think is really important.”

Research suggests that the risk of in-school transmissi­on is relatively low when schools take a variety of precaution­s, including requiring masks and improving ventilatio­n. But that research, like the two studies the CDC released Friday, was conducted before the omicron variant emerged.

Meanwhile, Pfizer said Friday it was changing plans and testing three doses of its COVID-19 vaccine in babies and preschoole­rs after the usual two shots didn’t appear strong enough for some of the children.

Pfizer announced the change after a preliminar­y analysis found 2- to 4-year-olds didn’t have as strong an immune response as expected to the very low-dose shots the company is testing in the youngest children.

It’s disappoint­ing news for families anxious to vaccinate their tots. Pfizer had expected data on how well the vaccines were working in children under 5 by year’s end, and it’s not clear how long the change will delay a final answer.

Pfizer and its partner BioNTech said if the threedose study is successful, they plan to apply for emergency authorizat­ion in the first half of 2022.

A kidsize version of Pfizer’s vaccine is available for 5- to 11-year-olds, one that’s a third of the dose given to people 12 and older.

For children younger than 5, Pfizer is testing an even smaller dose, just 3 micrograms or a tenth of the adult dose.

 ?? MARK LENNIHAN/AP ?? Parents complete forms Dec. 7 to allow random COVID-19 testing for students at a New York school.
MARK LENNIHAN/AP Parents complete forms Dec. 7 to allow random COVID-19 testing for students at a New York school.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States