Orlando Sentinel

A Trump judge rated ‘not qualified’ got it wrong on masks

-

COVID-19 caught the United States unprepared and unwilling in some ways to defend itself against the viral pandemic that has now taken nearly a million American lives. More than 400,000 had been lost by the time Joe Biden, on his first day as president, ordered face-masking across an array of federal agencies. His predecesso­r had been scornful of it.

There is no reasonable doubt that masks have saved lives, eased the burden on hospitals and helped Americans return to a semblance of normalcy. But a key element of that defense has been swept away by a Florida-based federal judge’s ludicrous interpreta­tion of the word “sanitation” in a 1944 law to mean only cleaning and to disallow face masks. For now, at least, the government is powerless to mandate masking in public transporta­tion, even with infections rising again.

The nation is newly more vulnerable to the next inevitable pandemic and to more of COVID-19’s frequent mutations.

This is the result of how Donald Trump and Senate Republican­s damaged the federal judiciary by packing it with people obsessed with “textualism.” It is a legal doctrine that means taking words as literally as possible, regardless of changed circumstan­ces or common sense.

To extend the mask mandate ruling by U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle to its ultimate absurdity, the CDC could require airline, train and bus companies to do nothing more than wipe down everything with Lysol.

A sanitation fixation

In her fixation on the word “sanitation” in the 1944 Public Health Service Act, Mizelle deftly ignored a subsequent phrase “and other measures, as … may be necessary.”

Yet she conceded the CDC’s finding that the mandate would limit transmissi­on of the disease and reduce serious illness and death. But she added that it wasn’t enough “to establish good cause.”

Mizelle was on firmer ground in holding that the CDC impermissi­bly skirted legal requiremen­ts for public notice and comment, but that’s easily fixable. Her textualist fantasy, however, can be overcome only by an appeal or by a new law.

The Biden administra­tion has no practical option other than to appeal, which it is doing. Given how COVID-19 precaution­s have been politicize­d, congressio­nal action would be at best too slow and perhaps impossible.

An appeal has its own obstacles, which could have even more damaging results. The first stage of an appeal is in the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, where a series of Trump appointmen­ts, including two from Florida, have skewed the court to the right. It now has seven judges appointed by Republican­s and only four chosen by Democratic presidents.

Beyond lies the Supreme Court, which has already made a mixed record on COVID defenses. With a 6-3 conservati­ve majority — again due to Trump and the Republican Senate — it overturned the CDC’s moratorium on evictions as well as OSHA’s mask mandate for larger businesses. On the other hand, it upheld mandates for military personnel and vaccinatio­n requiremen­ts for health workers.

Historians in the future will surely be as astonished as many people are today at how vaccinatio­n and face-masking, two of the proven front-line defenses against deadly diseases, became the fulcrums of political division between Republican­s and Democrats. It is reflected in death statistics as well as in public opinion polls.

Opportunis­tic state leaders like Gov. Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody are to blame for fostering and exploiting that division. With the privately financed lawsuit against the CDC already nearing a decision before Mizelle at the U.S. District Court in Tampa, DeSantis and Moody led 20 other Republican states in filing yet another in the same court against the CDC and other federal agencies. Perhaps long before any court rules, it will pay off handsomely in their fundraisin­g.

Rated ‘not qualified’

Mizelle’s appointmen­t exemplifie­s how not to pick a judge to serve for a lifetime. With the Senate still controlled by the Republican­s in December 2020, after Trump’s defeat, she was nominated by the lame-duck president and confirmed on a 49-41 party-line vote, despite being rated “not qualified” by the American Bar Associatio­n’s Standing Committee on the Judiciary. It cited her relative inexperien­ce — she was 33 at the time — having been a lawyer only eight years, and alleged that she had not tried to completion a civil or criminal case as a lead or co-counsel.

Civil rights organizati­ons objected to her record as a Justice Department attorney in helping to rescind Title IX guidance that protected transgende­r students and to filing a brief arguing in the Supreme Court that businesses have the right to discrimina­te against LGBTQ customers.

What undoubtedl­y mattered more to Trump was that she had been a law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and belonged to the Federalist Society, Trump’s go-to source for lifetime judicial appointmen­ts. She reportedly referred to Thomas as “the greatest living American.”

The Society is also one of DeSantis’ litmus tests for judicial appointmen­t. The group exalts textualism in the interpreta­tion of constituti­onal and statutory language. It’s a convenient pretext for rejecting anything the authors of the state and federal constituti­ons did not explicitly foresee — like a pandemic.

Republican­s unabashedl­y promise more of the same if they regain control of the U.S. Senate and return Trump to the presidency. Marco Rubio, Florida’s senior senator, hailed Mizelle’s decision and took credit for recommendi­ng her. That bears rememberin­g in November.

The Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board includes Editor-in-Chief Julie Anderson, Opinion Editor Krys Fluker, Viewpoints Editor Jay Reddick and El Sentinel Editor Jennifer Marcial Ocasio. The Sun Sentinel Editorial Board includes Editorial Page Editor Steve Bousquet, Deputy Editorial Page Editor Dan Sweeney, and Anderson. Contact us at insight@orlandosen­tinel.com.

 ?? THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Travelers at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta Internatio­nal Airport on April 19 the day after a federal judge struck down the mask mandate for air travel.
THE NEW YORK TIMES Travelers at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta Internatio­nal Airport on April 19 the day after a federal judge struck down the mask mandate for air travel.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States