Orlando Sentinel

Florida deserves the right to clean water

- Sign the petition to qualify the “Right to Clean and Healthy Waters” constituti­onal amendment for the 2024 ballot at floridarig­httocleanw­ater.org. Joseph Bonasia is Chair and SWFL Regional Director of the Florida Rights of Nature

If, in Florida, Mother Nature were a woman, she’d have the telltale signs of an abusive relationsh­ip: cut lips, black eyes, and broken bones.

The signs of abuse to nature in Florida are equally clear and disturbing: a million acres of estuaries and 9,000 miles of streams and rivers contaminat­ed with fecal bacteria; red tides and blue-green algae blooms that sicken people short-term, threaten long-term illness, and cripple local economies; wildlife that suffer, at times, like manatees, catastroph­ically.

This isn’t what Floridians want. We go to public hearings and plead for needed protection­s. We email our state representa­tives, call the governor’s office, and overwhelmi­ngly approve environmen­tal initiative­s only to see their intent undone. We “Enlist in the Fight for Clean Water!” as one town council near me has urged citizens to do.

Occasional­ly, we win a small battle, but we’re losing the war. Over half of Florida’s 4,393 waterways are polluted. Unquestion­ably, two things aren’t working well: our environmen­tal regulatory system and citizen actions to fix it.

We need a different approach to environmen­tal protection. Therefore, Florida Rights of Nature Network (FRONN) advocates a “Right to Clean and Healthy Waters” amendment to our state constituti­on.

To be clear, this amendment is not a Rights of Nature law. We at FRONN wish it were, because Floridians will never live sustainabl­y until our relationsh­ip with the natural world changes culturally and legally. Changing that relationsh­ip is what Rights of Nature is about.

We prefer a law like the historic Orange County “Right to Clean Water” amendment approved by 89% of voters two years ago that granted citizens a right to clean water, but also granted county waterways the right to exist, flow, be free of pollution, and maintain a healthy ecosystem.

What is permissibl­e on the county level, however, is not permissibl­e on the state level. An amendment to our constituti­on must focus on a single subject. Consequent­ly, a law like Orange County’s would not survive Florida Supreme Court review.

Instead of a right of nature, the amendment creates a fundamenta­l human right to nature, because the health of our families, the strength of our economy, and the wildlife we cherish, among other things, all depend upon clean and healthy waters.

Vital to our well-being, clean and healthy waters merit the protection only a fundamenta­l right can provide. This fundamenta­l right logically takes precedence over the rights of polluters, and the state is bound to act accordingl­y when, for example, it considers permits that would allow harm to our waters and aquatic ecosystems.

This law enables citizens to hold the state accountabl­e in court when through action or inaction it fails to protect our waters.

Currently, our environmen­tal regulatory system doesn’t recognize nature’s rights or interests. The state Legislatur­e made sure of this in 2020 when, in its Clean Waterways Act, it preempted the authority of local government­s to “grant any legal rights to a plant, an animal, a body of water, or any other part of the natural environmen­t.”

Nor is the system much concerned with human rights and interests. That same law denied the authority of local government­s to grant citizens “any specific rights relating to the natural environmen­t.” No right to clean air. No right to clean water.

These preemption­s reveal just how effective special interests and legislator­s fear a rightsbase­d approach to environmen­tal protection can be.

Instead, the system favors corporate rights and interests, which exert undue influence over our legislatur­e and environmen­tal policy and agencies. In its ability to hold the state accountabl­e, this law can start the crucial shift away from corporate rights and interests to human rights and interests.

With this right we can stop pollution at its source instead of paying billions to clean it up afterwards. We can stop the ransacking of our aquifers and restore flow to our springs. We can curtail the loss of wetlands and prevent the catastroph­ic loss of wildlife. We can stop the abuse.

 ?? ?? By Joseph Bonasia
By Joseph Bonasia

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States