Orlando Sentinel

DeSantis should veto alimony bill; every divorce is unique

- Rebecca L. Palmer is an Orlando family and marital law attorney and the managing partner of the Rebecca L. Palmer Law Group.

The Florida Legislatur­e recently passed SB 1796, a controvers­ial bill that changes how alimony is implemente­d and finalized. It is currently sitting on the governor’s desk — waiting to be signed or vetoed.

The bill removes the court’s ability to award permanent alimony for new and previous cases. It sets a duration on payments — spouses married for three years or less are no longer eligible for alimony, while marriages of 20 years or longer would be eligible to receive payments for up to 75% of the duration of the marriage.

The bill also revises the process for modifying alimony when the payer seeks to retire — it requires payers to give a one-year notice indicating their intentions of retiring and could stop payments upon retirement, except under certain circumstan­ces.

Additional­ly, the bill aims to implement a 50-50 time-sharing function for child custody under the “presumptio­n that equal time-sharing is in the best interest of the child.” This provision stems from the Florida House of Representa­tives House Bill 1395 and treats children as assets to be equally distribute­d.

As a family law attorney with more than 25 years of experience, I understand the implicatio­ns this bill creates if signed into law. Some attorneys have already pushed cases back in anticipati­on of the bill being signed, creating an early backlog, thereby increasing litigation costs and inundating the judicial system. The bill’s shortsight­ed and misguided intentions will severely impact families. No divorce agreement is the same; they are unique and deserve to be treated that way.

The alimony portions of the bill have the capability of pulling the rug from under ex-spouses who were promised alimony payments for life, creating an unnecessar­y crisis for those with years or decades-old divorce agreements.

Additional­ly, the 50-50 time sharing provision completely ignores the myriad of factors that must be considered for deciding how much time children need with each parent. It also puts pressure on parents seeking less alimony to ensure more time with their children, even though the lower alimony might be detrimenta­l to their livelihood. It can also be used as a tool to lower child-support payments. This one-size-fits-all approach will create more pain for children and families.

Divorce is complex; there is no easy way to navigate it. It takes an emotional and financial toll on both parties involved, but this bill will not alleviate the struggles of divorce proceeding­s. It will only exacerbate them by attempting to standardiz­e something that varies from case to case.

If you have a divorce agreement in the state of Florida, contact your family law attorney and review all the steps needed to prepare for your alimony agreement to be amended or outright canceled if this bill becomes law.

 ?? By Rebecca L. Palmer ??
By Rebecca L. Palmer

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States