Orlando Sentinel

Lawyers want high court to make decision on whether redistrict­ing lawmakers must testify

-

TALLAHASSE­E — House and Senate lawyers want to go quickly to the Florida Supreme Court in a legal battle about whether key lawmakers and staff members should be required to give deposition­s about a congressio­nal redistrict­ing plan.

The lawyers filed a document late Monday at the 1st District Court of Appeal requesting that the dispute be passed through to the Supreme Court, rather than first receiving a ruling from the appellate court. The House and Senate last week launched the appeal after Leon County Circuit Judge J. Lee Marsh issued an order that said current and former lawmakers could be questioned in a lawsuit challengin­g the constituti­onality of the redistrict­ing plan.

The House and Senate have contended that lawmakers and staff members should be shielded from deposition­s by the legal concept of legislativ­e privilege and what is known as the “apex doctrine.” That doctrine generally prevents deposition­s of high-ranking officials if informatio­n can be obtained in other ways.

In his Oct. 27 order, Marsh pointed to legal precedent that required lawmakers to testify in challenges to redistrict­ing plans passed in 2012. In the document filed Monday, House and Senate lawyers indicated they will challenge the precedent.

“This appeal raises questions of great public importance that warrant immediate resolution by the Florida Supreme Court,” the document said. “Most importantl­y, the individual legislator­s and staff assert the legislativ­e privilege and

“This appeal raises questions of great public importance that warrant immediate resolution by the Florida Supreme Court.”

— Document filed late Monday by House and Senate lawyers requesting dispute bypass the appellate court

maintain that Apportionm­ent IV (the ruling after the 2012 redistrict­ing) was wrongly decided.”

Groups such as the League of Women Voters of Florida filed the lawsuit in April, alleging that the plan violates a 2010 Fair Districts constituti­onal amendment that set standards for redistrict­ing.

Gov. Ron DeSantis pushed the redistrict­ing plan through the Legislatur­e in April, and it helped Republican­s add four congressio­nal seats in the

November elections.

Marsh’s order, if upheld on appeal, would allow plaintiffs’ lawyers to question former House Speaker Chris Sprowls, R-Palm Harbor; former Sen. Ray Rodrigues, R-Estero; former Sen. Aaron Bean, R-Fernandina Beach; Sen. Jennifer Bradley, R-Fleming Island; Rep. Tom Leek, R-Ormond Beach; Rep. Tyler Sirois, R-Merritt Island; and current and former staff members, including former House Chief of Staff Mat Bahl.

 ?? AP FILE ?? House and Senate lawyers want the Florida Supreme Court to decide if lawmakers should be required to testify in the lawsuit questionin­g the constituti­onality of redistrict­ing done this year.
AP FILE House and Senate lawyers want the Florida Supreme Court to decide if lawmakers should be required to testify in the lawsuit questionin­g the constituti­onality of redistrict­ing done this year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States