Orlando Sentinel

Environmen­talists question several new developmen­t bills

Proposals counter DeSantis’ clean water commitment

- By Jim Turner News Service of Florida

TALLAHASSE­E — Environmen­tal groups are raising concerns that legislativ­e proposals would damage land-use planning and run counter to conservati­on efforts backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Representa­tives of 1000 Friends of Florida, Friends of the Everglades and VoteWater on Thursday targeted several bills filed for the legislativ­e session beginning Tuesday that could do such things as redefine sprawl, deter residents from challengin­g comprehens­ive land-plan amendments and prevent cities and counties from regulating wetlands.

VoteWater Executive Director Gil Smart said during a conference call that the measures would result in reckless developmen­t and greater amounts of polluted stormwater runoff.

“Gov. DeSantis put forth what I think is a sort of a policy statement on his commitment to clean water,” Smart said. “All of these bills go in the exact opposite direction. All of them would lead to dirtier water.”

In January, DeSantis issued an executive order that called for “meaningful” funding for the Florida Forever land-conservati­on program and continued support for the Resilient Florida Program, which is designed to help protect against sea-level rise.

He also proposed spending $3.5 billion over the next four years on projects such as restoring the Everglades and addressing water-quality problems.

DeSantis’ outline also seeks to speed work on a sprawling wildlife corridor and to protect coral reefs.

Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, previously called DeSantis’ outline “vague” and said it will be essential to track how the money is eventually spent.

On Thursday, Samples focused on bills that have been filed and, in at least some cases, have already started moving through House and Senate committees.

Samples said Florida was considered the leader in land planning after the 1985 Growth Management Act.

But she said sound growth policies have been slowly undercut by lawmakers for more than a decade and that 2023 is shaping up to be “the worst session we’ve seen in terms of bad developmen­t bills since 2011.”

Among other things, the Legislatur­e in 2011 eliminated the Department of Community Affairs and shifted land-planning oversight to the newly created Department of Economic Opportunit­y.

As an example of this year’s bills criticized by environmen­tal groups, two Senate committees last month approved a measure (SB 170) that could bolster legal challenges to city and county ordinances.

In part, the bill would require local government­s to suspend enforcemen­t of ordinances while lawsuits play out. Also, plaintiffs who successful­ly challenge ordinances in court could receive up to $50,000 for attorney fees and costs. The bill is ready to go to the full Senate.

“I do believe that this bill will streamline some of the processes for local government­s and give citizens a fundamenta­l right to level the playing field for those who feel trapped in arbitrary and unreasonab­le local laws,” bill sponsor Jay Trumbull, R-Panama City, said Feb. 23 as the measure was approved by the Rules Committee.

Other bills drawing concerns from environmen­tal groups include:

„ HB 41 and SB 856, which would prohibit voter initiative­s or referendum­s on amendments to land-developmen­t regulation­s.

„ HB 359 and SB 540, which could lead to people and organizati­ons being forced to pay legal fees if they unsuccessf­ully challenge changes to comprehens­ive growth-management plans at the state Division of Administra­tive Hearings.

„ HB 1197 and SB 1240, which would preempt local-government regulation­s about water quality, water quantity, pollution control and wetlands. The state could withhold funds to local government­s that violate the preemption.

„ HB 397, which would allow local government officials to meet privately with developers’ attorneys who contend violations of the Bert Harris Private Property Rights Act have occurred.

The Bert Harris act allows property owners to seek damages if government decisions have “inordinate­ly burdened” property use.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States