Oroville Mercury-Register

Decision deals blow to Trump efforts on House seats

- By Mike Schneider

Pre sident Donald Trump’s effort to exclude people in the U. S. illegally from being counted in the process for divvying up congressio­nal seats was dealt another blow Wednesday when the Census Bureau’s director indefinite­ly halted an effort to gather data on the citizenshi­p status of every U.S. resident.

Bureau workers laboring to comply with the Trump order were instructed to “‘stand down’ and discontinu­e their data reviews,” Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham said in a memo.

A review indicated problems with the data that would require additional work, Dillingham said.

Dillingham’s memo came after the Office of Inspector General reported Tuesday that bureau workers were under significan­t pressure from two Trump political appointees, Nathaniel Cogley and Benjamin Overholt, to figure out who is in the U. S illegally, using federal and state administra­tive records. Bureau statistici­ans worried that any citizenshi­p figures they were forced to produce would be incomplete, misinterpr­eted and tarnish the statistica­l agency’s reputation, the inspector general said in a memo.

Dillingham had set a Friday deadline for bureau statistici­ans to provide him a technical report on the effort, the inspector general’s memo said, though Dillingham said in a response that the request had come from another bureau official.

Trump two years ago ordered the Census Bureau to use administra­tive records to figure out who is in the country illegally after the Supreme Court blocked his administra­tion’s effort to put a citizenshi­p question on the 2020 census questionna­ire. Informatio­n about citizenshi­p status could be used to implement another Trump order seeking to exclude people in the country illegally from the count used for divvying up congressio­nal seats and Electoral College votes, as well as the annual distributi­on of $1.5 trillion in federal spending, among the states.

An influentia­l GOP adviser had advocated excluding them from the apportionm­ent process in order to favor Republican­s and non-Hispanic whites. Trump’s unpreceden­ted order on apportionm­ent was challenged in more than a half- dozen lawsuits across the U. S., but the Supreme Court ruled last month that any challenge was premature.

The ability to implement Trump’s apportionm­ent order is in jeopardy since the processing of the data is not scheduled to be done until early March because irregulari­ties discovered during the numbers- crunching phase of the 2020 census need to be fixed, Trump administra­tion attorneys said Monday.

That revised deadline dealt another blow to the apportionm­ent order because it is weeks after Trump leaves office and President- elect Joe Biden is sworn in Jan. 20. Biden has said he opposes the effort, and Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, which had challenged the apportionm­ent order, urged Biden on Wednesday to rescind it when he takes office.

“President Trump tried and failed throughout his entire presidency to weaponize the census for his attacks on immigrant communitie­s,” Ho said. “It appears he has failed yet again.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States