Oroville Mercury-Register

New immigratio­n boss? Same as the old boss

- Navarrette’s email address is crimscribe@icloud.com. His podcast, “Ruben in the Center,” is available through every podcast app.

SAN DIEGO >> Bah humbug! On the immigratio­n issue, President Biden has turned into a real Scrooge.

Biden has broken campaign promises, reversed course on reforms, made false claims about what’s going on at the border, pretended that his enforcemen­t tactics are more humane than those of President Donald Trump, rolled back protection­s for migrants, denied refugees a path to asylum and adopted some of the same Trump policies that he once pledged to end.

One minute, Biden is fixing sections of Trump’s “big, beautiful wall” on the U.S.-Mexico border — despite criticizin­g the internatio­nal barrier and pledging not to build any more of it.

The next minute, Biden is preserving Title 42, which was created by the Public Health Service Act of 1944 to “protect public health” by keeping out foreigners.

It was a federal judge, and not the administra­tion, that ordered the terminatio­n of Title 42 by Dec. 21.

It’s politics. The Democrat is terrified of being seen as soft on immigratio­n. In an election year, he has wanted no part of video footage of migrants rushing across the U.S.-Mexico border.

It’s Biden’s good fortune whenever the federal courts tell him he can’t follow through with a controvers­ial reform measure that the pro-immigratio­n left supports. The president gets to shrug and say: “Oh well, I tried. The courts stopped me.” It’s classic Biden: Do nothing, then seek credit for doing nothing.

That’s what happened earlier this year when the Supreme Court blocked the Biden administra­tion from implementi­ng a directive from the Homeland Security Department. The order paused deportatio­ns for individual­s unless they committed acts of terrorism or espionage, or posed “egregious threats to public safety.” When the justices told the administra­tion that it had oversteppe­d, there must have been relief at the White House.

But what happens when the courts don’t stop the administra­tion from pushing a reform? Then it’s code red. Panicked advisers start leafing through ketchup-stained blueprints from the last administra­tion to create their own Trump-like policies, which they rebrand with new names.

In June, the Supreme Court backed the Biden administra­tion’s attempt to end the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which Trump used to house asylum seekers south of the border. Biden suspended the program shortly after taking office in January 2021, but state governors demanded its reinstatem­ent. The justices — by a 5-4 vote — gave Biden the green light to rescind the policy and welcome asylum seekers onto U.S. soil. But according to news reports, the

White House is instead trying to come up with ways to keep asylum seekers and other migrants out of the United States.

It’s another Biden betrayal of the pro-immigrant crowd that helped get him elected. What a weasel this guy turned out to be.

There I go again. Whenever I criticize a Democrat, White liberals tell me they’re “disappoint­ed” — as if this Mexican American columnist were a social science project gone awry.

They’re not the only ones who are disappoint­ed. Biden has been a huge letdown to Latinos on immigratio­n, which may help explain why so many of us are fleeing to the Republican Party.

It won’t be as easy for the GOP to disappoint us, because we expect so little. Republican­s spend their time pandering to racists and declaring an invasion on the U.S.-Mexico border. It’s rich that the GOP — which relies on campaign contributi­ons from businesses that rely on immigrant labor — portrays Biden as presiding over an open border while its benefactor­s at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce hold up “Help Wanted” signs.

Now, the question is not whether Latinos who want a more humane immigratio­n policy should vote for Trump. It’s why any of them should ever again cast a vote for Biden.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States