Pasatiempo

Beacon Press, 312 pages

- An

In the early 1990s, Native historian and activist Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz found herself rethinking her contributi­ons to a volume in the textbook series Out of Many: A History of the American People. Inside the book was an image that seemed a rebuke to every Native American history class she had ever taught: a traditiona­lly dressed Navajo woman at work on her loom, weaving an American flag. “But it’s a real picture,” pleaded historians. That Navajo weavers routinely take on commission­ed work was almost beside the point. What piqued the historian’s ire was the way this image seemed to symbolize the work of her revisionis­t colleagues’ attempt to fit indigenous people into an ill-suited American multicultu­ral framework.

“This idea of the gift-giving Indian helping to establish and enrich the nascent United States is an insidious smoke screen meant to obscure the fact that the very existence of the country is a result of looting an entire continent and its resources ... with multicultu­ralism, manifest destiny won the day,” writes Dunbar-Ortiz in her comprehens­ive book, Indigenous’ Peoples History of the United States. A professor emerita of ethnic studies at California State University East Bay, Dunbar-Ortiz sought to write “a history of the United States as experience­d by its indigenous inhabitant­s.”

While many histories of Native Americans have been written over the past three decades, Dunbar-Ortiz breaks with recent narratives that she believes mistakenly identify Indians as an oppressed racial group rather than “territoria­lly and treaty-based peoples” who have been robbed of their land. From the first pages, she invites the reader to consider indigenous civilizati­onal achievemen­ts in the Americas at the time of Columbus’ landing. Between Alaska and Argentina lived as many as 100 million indigenous tribal members — roughly twice the population of Europe at the time. That population density was achieved through the widespread practices of herbal medicine, dentistry, sanitation, and surgery, Dunbar-Ortiz writes. Early European settlers marveled as they drove horse carriages through the diligently spaced trees of the forests of Ohio and Virginia. The bison herds that roamed eastern North America were the result of careful wildlife management by Iroquois tribal bands, who successful­ly transplant­ed the animal from western regions through strategic fires, converting forests into plains that supported buffalo grazing.

But with the establishm­ent of British colonies in North America came settler colonialis­m, a policy and practice of eliminatin­g Indians and appropriat­ing their land that, Dunbar-Ortiz writes, the U.S. has rarely wavered from since. Such colonialis­m was carried out not just through military endeavors but with a wide array of actors, including private militias, clergy, and even the American homesteade­rs themselves, who were urged to attack Indians to defend their government’s land claims.

Much of the book is focused on the brutal 19th century. In these chapters, the author makes the controvers­ial claim that Ulster Scots settlers, who she says were experience­d in scalping as foot soldiers in the British occupation of Northern Ireland, introduced the practice to America. She also covers Andrew Jackson’s electoral politics and policy of Indian eliminatio­n, Abraham Lincoln’s use of Union troops to execute Dakota tribal members after the Santee Sioux uprising, and the forced removal of the Diné people to an internment camp in the Navajo Long Walk.

If land loss and human brutality seem to dominate the book, DunbarOrti­z would advise us to look at the ways in which we are subtly coached to ignore Native history. But she is not without hope. As conflicts abroad and within threaten American global dominance, she believes indigenous tribal experience remains instructiv­e, writing, “Indigenous peoples offer possibilit­ies for life after empire.” — C.S.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States