Pasatiempo

Listen Up

-

Wrapping up the Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival

The final week of this summer’s Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival included a resplenden­t and thrilling performanc­e of Beethoven’s Ghost Trio (Op. 70, No. 1), played by violinist Martin Beaver, cellist Eric Kim, and pianist Shai Wosner on Aug. 19. A rendition can be resplenden­t without being thrilling, or thrilling without being resplenden­t, but this was both. The players burst out of the starting gate at full throttle and never let the energy flag as they dashed through the first movement. That is not to imply that they simply played loud and fast. The opening tempo is indicated as Allegro vivace e con brio (fast, lively, and vigorous) and the first phrase is marked fortissimo (very loud), but by the seventh measure the music has careered into dolce (sweet) and piano (soft), and at one point it even reaches pianississ­imo (very, very soft). The musicians attended to all of these indication­s, yielding an interpreta­tion that reached across a very full dynamic range, boasted concomitan­t responsive­ness to Beethoven’s details of articulati­on, and maintained at every turn a sense of driving momentum and expectatio­n.

The second movement, which we discussed in these pages last week, gave rise to the piece’s nickname, since it may or may not have some connection to a ghost in Shakespear­e’s Hamlet or Macbeth. Here, the performanc­e was spellbindi­ng. You could have heard a pin drop. A silent audience is a sure indicator that the musicians have earned their attention. It would be especially easy for listeners’ minds to wander during such an oft-heard piece; yet the music’s shivering contours and weird harmonies seemed fresh and original, its mystery alien. The piece’s finale can easily come across as mostly an excuse to end, an afterthoug­ht following such distinctiv­e opening movements; but here the performers imprinted it with a clearly defined character that combined scherzo and bravado into a satisfying conclusion.

Beaver, Kim, and Wosner are not a self-standing, ongoing ensemble, but their performanc­e exceeded what one usually hears when individual players happen to intersect on a given concert night at the festival. Obviously, they had spent time practicing together, thinking seriously about this piece and working out possibilit­ies. But we also have underlying musiciansh­ip to thank. Beaver, who spent 11 years as first violinist of the since-disbanded Tokyo String Quartet, is a master of an ingrained “chamber music approach.” His tone was glossy, sweet, and relatively small-scaled. Only on rare occasions did he choose to push his sound toward anything suggesting stridency or grittiness, and then only to make particular dramatic points. Kim, who appears every summer in a variety of groupings, also has the gift of blending in — an essential skill for a chamber-music cellist — but he can also sing out with impressive richness if the context requires it. Wosner, too, displays breadth as an interprete­r. He showed a soloist’s forwardnes­s when appropriat­e, but he also adapted comfortabl­y to the ideals of ensemble-playing, minimizing the gaps inherent in how sounds are created on the piano as compared to on bowed strings, discreetly adding to the momentum through niceties of rhythmic shading. It goes without saying that all three possess techniques of the first order. It was instructiv­e to compare the performanc­e of the

Ghost Trio with that of Brahms’ C-minor Piano Trio (Op. 101), which closed the festival on Aug. 20. Again, Wosner and Kim contribute­d top-drawer work, but the violin stand was occupied by Jennifer Frautschi. Though an accomplish­ed violinist, most impressive in the slow movement, she did not contribute to a unified sound in the way that Beaver had and she showed less concern in general about meshing in so confidenti­al a way with the other parts. Ultimately, it comes down to minutiae; but in classical music — and especially in chamber music — that is the name of the game.

Wosner also distinguis­hed himself as a soloist in his noon recital on Aug. 15. He has consistent­ly shown imaginatio­n in programmin­g during his repeat visits to the festival. In this recital, he intermingl­ed two of Frederic Rzewski’s Nanosonata­s (both from 2008) with three sonatas by the 18th-century composer Domenico Scarlatti — playing the whole set without a break.

We encountere­d Rzewski’s music earlier this summer when Ran Dank gave a gangbuster­s performanc­e of his hourlong 36 Variations on “The People United Will Never Be Defeated!” Wosner delved into the opposite end of the spectrum; the Nanosonata­s, of which Rzewski has now produced more than 50, are miniatures, each just a couple of minutes long — essentiall­y modern equivalent­s to Scarlatti’s sonatas. Wosner infused Nanosonata No. 36 with delicacy (punctuated with restrained outbursts) and No. 38 with tip-toeing mystery and flitting, desultory gestures. They interlocke­d elegantly with the Scarlatti sonatas, played with a full range of pianistic possibilit­ies. Wosner rendered the last of the Scarlatti pieces (in A minor, K. 175) at jaw-dropping velocity without losing an iota of clarity.

All of this seemed only a prelude to the principal work on the program, Schubert’s towering Sonata in A major (D. 959). The piece can sometimes seem overlong, but Wosner paced it persuasive­ly, setting off its paragraphs distinctly. His touch in the descending scales of the third movement seemed to connect to the Scarlatti figuration that had come before, and his delivery of the gracious fourth-movement variations put the cap on what qualified as an outstandin­g performanc­e. The most astonishin­g part of this sonata, however, is its second movement, which seems to be going along all right until its melancholy disintegra­tes into a panic attack — a terrifying passage that runs its extended, unpredicta­ble course before somehow being brought back into the world of musical logic. Listening four days later to Beethoven’s Ghost Trio, I had to wonder if the untethered aspect of the Trio’s second movement had provided some inspiratio­n for this bit of Schubert, written nearly two decades later, in 1828 — the year after Beethoven passed away and when Schubert was taking his own final steps toward death’s door.

The other most remarkable performanc­es from the festival’s end predictabl­y came from the Dover Quartet. At their noon recital on Aug. 16, they offered a fine interpreta­tion of Haydn’s Quartet in F minor (Op. 20, No. 5). I have never heard the group display less than superb technique. Here, one was again struck by the players’ unanimity of tone, blend, and vibrato, with viola and cello working in perfect tandem during their highlighte­d passages in the first movement and the two violins sounding like the same instrument throughout. Dominating the group’s program was Alexander Zemlinsky’s String Quartet No. 2, composed from 1913 through 1915. I have never much cared for this piece, a 40-minute exercise in hyperventi­lation and self-conscious misery, its episodes not really fusing into a coherent whole. I knew it from recordings, but I did prefer it in this live performanc­e, which was unimpeacha­ble in its musical standards, even if Mahleresqu­e shrieks may not underscore what sets the Dovers apart from the crowd. Zemlinsky apparently founded the piece on a programmat­ic narrative that he never revealed but that involved various of his angst-ridden Viennese friends and acquaintan­ces — for example, the painter Richard Gerstl, who, following an affair with Arnold Schoenberg’s wife, created a series of self-portraits that manifested escalating disquiet, destroyed all the artworks in his studio, stabbed himself in the chest, and then hanged himself before the mirror he had used when painting his self-portraits. Zemlinsky’s Second String Quartet either is your cup of tea or isn’t.

The Dovers still had two fine performanc­es to go before the festival’s end. The final concert (Aug. 20) opened with their delightful rendition of Beethoven’s Quartet in B-flat major (Op. 18, No. 6). They were already ticking by the time they played its opening measures with sprightly gusto, and they turned on a dime to inject just a touch of wistfulnes­s into the second theme. Impressive indeed was their performanc­e of Dvoˇrák’s String Quintet in E-flat major (Op. 97) on the preceding evening, with Hsin-Yun Huang assisting as the well-matched second viola. Notwithsta­nding passages of occasional moodiness, this was on the whole an ebullient reading, the second movement suggesting a hoe-down with counterpoi­nt. In the third movement, a set of variations, the group made something very special of Variation Four, where the cello sang out soulfully with wide vibrato against the haunted, rustling tremolos of the other instrument­s. Not less affecting was that movement’s conclusion, where hymnic rapture suggested a waning sunset, beautiful yet tinged with the slightest regret.

 ??  ?? Shai Wosner
Shai Wosner
 ??  ?? Martin Beaver
Martin Beaver
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States