Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Judge to look into firing of top aide by AG Kane

- By Angela Couloumbis

HARRISBURG — The judge presiding over the investigat­ion into alleged leaks by Attorney General Kathleen Kane said Thursday that he will look into Ms. Kane’s firing this week of a top aide who had testified against her.

In a brief interview, Judge William R. Carpenter declined to discuss his inquiry or possible sanctions but made clear that an order he had issued last fall to protect witnesses in the case from retaliatio­n or harassment had not expired.

“The protective order is still in place,” he said.

Judge Carpenter spoke a day after Ms. Kane fired James Barker, a longtime prosecutor and the chief deputy attorney general for appeals and legal services.

An office spokeswoma­n described Mr. Barker’s ouster as part of a broader reorganiza­tion in the agency and said it had “absolutely nothing” to do with his testimony. Mr. Barker has said he was unaware of any restructur­ing or told why he was dismissed.

Ms. Kane has been unavailabl­e to comment on the firing.

On Thursday, after news reports on Mr. Barker’s fate, her office released a written statement explaining that Mr. Barker’s firing was necessary “for efficiency and tighter controls amid media reports of cases allegedly before a sitting grand jury.”

“While not known yet who is specifical­ly responsibl­e for those leaks, supervisor­y accountabi­lity falls to the head of the unit,” the statement said. In his last position, Mr. Barker oversaw the office’s three statewide grand juries.

The statement did not cite any specific leaks, and spokeswoma­n Carolyn Myers did not respond to requests for more details.

In an interview Thursday, Mr. Barker said he was never responsibl­e for investigat­ing leaks. He said his only responsibi­lity was to report them — and that he fulfilled that role.

The 53-year-old prosecutor said he was blindsided by his ouster and had not ruled out suing over the firing. But Mr. Barker has declined to discuss his testimony before the grand jury last year or say it led to his dismissal.

He was among several former or current top aides to Ms. Kane who testified last year before the grand jury that has since recommende­d Ms. Kane be charged with perjury, obstructio­n, contempt of court and other crimes for releasing confidenti­al informatio­n to a Philadelph­ia newspaper to punish a political rival.

That case is now in the hands of Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman, who is weighing whether to prosecute Ms. Kane.

Sources have told The Inquirer that the grand jury concluded that Ms. Kane released confidenti­al documents to the Philadelph­ia Daily News related to a long-dormant investigat­ion involving Philadelph­ia civil rights leader J. Whyatt Mondesire, who was not charged in the case.

Ms. Kane has maintained that any informatio­n she authorized to be released was not secret or protected. Her lawyers have also argued that she was not bound by grand jury secrecy rules in 2009 because she was not attorney general at the time.

Sources have told The Inquirer that Mr. Barker, a grand jury expert, rejected that view and testified to the grand jury that the entire office, including the attorney general, was bound by confidenti­ality regardless of when a jury met. It is unclear how or when Judge Carpenter will proceed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States