Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Israel allows prisons to force-feed inmates waging hunger strikes

- By Diaa Hadid

JERUSALEM — Israeli legislator­s voted Thursday to allow the force-feeding of hunger-striking prisoners in extreme cases, a move that appeared to be aimed at preventing Palestinia­n inmates from using fasts to win their release, particular­ly from indefinite incarcerat­ion.

Rights groups condemned the move, and the Israeli Medical Associatio­n called it “torture” and vowed to appeal the legislatio­n.

In recent years, hundreds of Palestinia­ns have conducted collective and individual hunger strikes. Some obtained better conditions in detention, and a handful were promised early release if they halted their fasts.

Most prominentl­y, the Israeli authoritie­s released Khader Adnan, a detainee who had become a symbol of resistance for many Palestinia­ns, on July 12, fearing that his life was in danger after he fasted for 55 days.

The Public Security Ministry, which put the bill forward, said it was a humane move to prevent prisoners from harming themselves and from pressuring the Israeli authoritie­s.

“In the last few months and years, there were prisoners and detainees that were released after they hunger-striked,” said Yoel Hadar, a legal adviser to the ministry. “They reached such a situation that after negotiatio­ns, the Israelis decided to release them.”

Mr. Hadar added: “It can’t be a concept that all prisoners think the way to get out of prison is to hunger-strike. We can’t accept that way of thinking. No country can accept it.”

He said that force-feeding would be used only in the most extreme circumstan­ces.

Two Palestinia­n hunger strikers died in 1980 after they were force-fed. Palestinia­n prisoner rights activists said force-feeding had been used only very rarely since.

Mr. Hadar said the United States, Australia, Austria and some districts of Switzerlan­d also allowed some form of force-feeding. He said Israeli doctors would not be compelled to comply.

The law, which was passed on a 46-40 vote, “allows the prisons commission­er to ask a court for permission to force-feed a prisoner, if a doctor recommends doing so and there is an imminent danger of a severe deteriorat­ion in the prisoner’s health,” said a statement published on the Israeli parliament website.

The law stipulates that the force-feeding must be done in private and in “as dignified a manner as possible.” But prison officials are allowed to use “reasonable force,” and, the statement said, a doctor must be present.

Palestinia­n prisoner rights activists said the law robbed detainees of their only means to protest incarcerat­ion.

“It’s the last thing that Palestinia­ns have to defend themselves and to regain their dignity in the prisons of the occupation,” said Muhannad Alazzah, a researcher at Addameer, a Palestinia­n prisoner rights group.

At the core of many Palestinia­n hunger strikes is administra­tive detention, in which detainees can be held for renewable six-month periods, sometimes stretching into years. In such trials, security officials typically present evidence only to judges, not to detained Palestinia­ns or their lawyers. Israeli security officials say they cannot make charges public because it will expose their intelligen­ce-gathering systems.

The Israeli Medical Associatio­n said it would appeal the new law in court and asked its members not to cooperate with it.

“It cannot be done without endangerin­g the patient and causing him a lot of suffering,” said Leonid Eidelman, president of the medical associatio­n.

Dr. Eidelman said forcefeedi­ng a hunger striker meant restrictin­g the detainee’s movement and forcibly inserting a tube, which can cause bleeding or, if the prisoner is moving, enter the lungs.

He contrasted the law with current practice in Israel, where he said doctors had “very good experience” taking care of hunger strikers. During the last few years, Dr. Eidelman said, “we had more than 1,000 hunger strikers, no one died and none was force-fed.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States