Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Cowboys taking it on the chin

Yes, we should be aware of the environmen­tal costs of meat production — but consider the gains, and the nature of the cow

- Blake Hurst Blake Hurst is a farmer in northwest Missouri and president of the Missouri Farm Bureau. He wrote this for The Washington Post.

Pity the poor cowboy. Once the hero of hundreds of movies, television shows and pulp novels, he’s no longer an icon. Instead, he’s a social pariah, spending his days caring for cows, the worst environmen­tal villain that modern man can imagine.

No longer a larger-thanlife figure like John Wayne or Gary Cooper, the presentday cowboy has the social cachet of an Exxon executive without the stock options or the private jet. He’s still out there on his horse or his four-wheeler, but he’s no longer anyone’s hero.

True, he’s finally free of the diet mavens who bedeviled him for a generation (four meta-analyses published since 2009 have failed to find any connection between consumptio­n of saturated fat and heart disease). But now our lonely cowpuncher is attacked by global climate-change warriors, who have decided that only the hamburger stands between modern man and Eden.

I remember my fall 1975 introducti­on to the rumen, which is one part of the cow’s four-part stomach. The cow had a viewing port in her side, and college classmates and I had the chance to get a firsthand view (and smell) of what was going on in our beef animal’s stomach. It still strikes me as something of a miracle. Grass, hay, weeds, thistles — all plant material useless to humans — changed by the rumen into porterhous­e steaks.

What we smelled that day was methane — the proximate cause of the cowboy’s present malaise, but we didn’t know that then. We just knew that most land isn’t suitable for the production of corn, lettuce, cabbage, kale or arugula — and it isn’t today. Cows make marginal land a source of nutrition, and that’s an amazing thing. The main indictment of the beef industry is that it isn’t sustainabl­e, but surely a large part of sustainabi­lity is the cow’s ability to use what we cannot, benefiting us in the most delicious of ways. And yes, I know that cows eat corn — but they typically only do so in the last few weeks before they go to market, while “grass-fed” cattle spend their whole lives eating grass and other roughage.

Yet today we are told as often as a cow regurgitat­es her cud that the methane from millions of those miraculous rumens is an especially powerful cause of global warming. According to the United Nations Food and Agricultur­e Organizati­on, livestock accounts for around 15 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. Is that too much? Not if you are hungry — if you’re in a developing nation where the only easy food source is meat, for instance, do what you must. But as Americans who have plenty to eat, we should certainly ask about the environmen­tal cost of our love affair with steak.

Economist Jayson Lusk has attempted to answer that question by using the Environmen­tal Protection Agency’s estimate of the carbon equivalent of methane emissions released by the production of beef, dividing that total by the pounds of beef we eat and multiplyin­g the result by the EPA’s estimated carbon cost to the environmen­t. When you’ve done all those calculatio­ns, you have an estimate of the carbon cost of beef. That number, according to Mr. Lusk, is about 18 cents per pound — not an enormous cost in the grand scheme of things. Worried about the environmen­tal impact of eating beef? Just consume what you would if a Quarter Pounder cost an extra 4 cents.

Before we decide that beef is a luxury that humankind can no longer afford, a little bit of history might be in order — a reminder that the future is hard to see. In 1980, the U.S government published the first set of dietary guidelines, which called for less saturated fat and less red meat. Since then, we’ve cut our consumptio­n of beef by about a third, and the obesity rate in the United States has nearly tripled. Of course, correlatio­n doesn’t mean causation, but we at least should apply skepticism to the latest dietary fad or grand plan to save the world by a single change in our diet.

Cowboys will always be my heroes. And I will always eat steak to celebrate the milestones in my life. Somehow, tofu for a graduation or broccoli for a promotion just doesn’t seem right. Cowboys have learned to produce beef more efficientl­y, cutting methane emissions significan­tly in the past 30 years using better feed efficiency and encouragin­g faster growth. If that trend continues — and there is no reason it shouldn’t — we can celebrate our special occasions without guilt.

So, fire up the grill, and enjoy beef. It’s the cowboy way.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States