Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Donors give perks to officehold­ers, leaders at DNC

- By Claudia Vargas

From before the Democratic National Convention’s first gavel till after the last, people with deep pockets were treating Democratic leaders and officehold­ers to parties and perks.

There were butlered hors d’oeuvres of tuna tartare, truffle mac-andcheese, unlimited wine and liquor. All in all, more than 100 parties, lunches and outings surroundin­g the main event.

There was Sunday’s welcome party at Sugar House Casino hosted by U.S. Rep. Bob Brady, the city’s Democratic chief, where House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and many other elected officials mingled with donors over free food, booze and a live band. Names of sponsors, ranging from labor (the carpenters and plumbers unions) to law (Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young), flashed on a screen behind the band.

Monday morning, tobacco giant Altria, Duke Energy and others hosted a charity outing at Merion Golf Club. Members of Congress and other officehold­ers were invited. The press was not.

Sponsors often say such convention-related events are meant to boost the democratic process or help a city play host. Critics say there’s more to it.

“They all have different types of interests pending before the federal government,” said Craig Holman of the nonpartisa­n watchdog group Public Citizen. “These parties allow them to get close to Congress members and senior congressio­nal staff.”

Sponsorshi­p of such events is a legal way companies, unions or other interests can get involved in the convention hoopla. Another: To help pay for the convention by donating to the host committee. For the Democrats, that’s Philadelph­ia 2016 — the nonpartisa­n group charged with raising at least $60 million to throw the bash. The Democratic Party also was raising funds to put on the show.

This year is the first time parties and host cities are covering the cost with no help from Washington: the federal government no longer provides millions of dollars to both parties for nominating convention­s, aside from $50 million for security.

Of course, the full list of who’s paying for this convention isn’t known: A judge upheld the host committee’s decision to keep its finances private until 60 days from now, the deadline under by federal campaign law.

Some donors’ names have come to light — companies such as American Airlines, Comcast, Aramark and General Motors; unions such as the American Federation of Teachers; law firms such as Philadelph­ia-based Cozen O’Connor. None would say how much they’re giving. All are getting some level of VIP treatment.

Examples of the effort to recruit convention donors and ply them with perks turned up in the leak of thousands of Democratic Party emails posted last Friday by Wikileaks.

A retired Washington antique dealer gave $38,400 to the party’s convention fund and was invited to a roundtable discussion with President Barack Obama.

She also “DESPERATEL­Y wants a photo with the nominee, herself, her daughter, and her granddaugh­ter” and “is willing to pay more to make that happen,” a party aide emailed colleagues May 16.

Lee Whack, spokesman for the party’s convention organizers, said he didn’t “want to get into that right now” when asked what sponsors get in return for helping finance the event. He declined to answer further questions Thursday.

“We’re not billing it as access-driven,” host committee spokeswoma­n Anna Adams-Sarthou said of the VIP packages the committee offered to the most generous donors. “It’s more of an enhanced experience for our local leaders, supporters and stakeholde­rs.”

Sponsors also get visibility at the convention: At the Wells Fargo Center, AT&T had cell phone charging stations throughout; Microsoft and Comcast had big displays.

“It’s all part of the schmoozing game,” Mr. Holman said. “They want their corporate logo present. These gifts are well-recognized by party leaders as to which companies are footing the bill.”

Corporatio­ns also do their own hosting.

“You have a lot of decision-makers and lawmakers, not something the regular American has access to,” said Chris MacKenzie of the Public Interest Research Group. “The primary goal of donors is spending time with these people building relationsh­ips.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States