Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Ready … aim … vote

There’s no limit to the pandering the NRA requires of its chosen candidates

- Gail Collins Gail Collins is a columnist for The New York Times.

The hottest political ad of the season — I am not counting anything involving Triumph the Insult Comic Dog — is probably for the Missouri Senate, in which the Democratic candidate talks about … gun background checks.

Well, obviously we all miss the one about hog neutering.

But this is pretty darned good. Democrat Jason Kander, who served a tour of duty in Afghanista­n, assembles an assault rifle blindfolde­d while saying that he believes “in background checks so the terrorists can’t get their hands on one of these.”

His Republican opponent, Sen. Roy Blunt, had been lambasting Mr. Kander for his failure to toe the straight National Rifle Associatio­n line. “I approve this message,” Mr. Kander concludes, swiftly finishing his eyes-closed assemblage, “because I’d like to see Sen. Blunt do this.”

Not going to happen. But Mr. Blunt did release a collection of videos of blindfolde­d rifle assemblers. (“Some do it … really, really fast.”) And then the announcer reminds Missouri that the NRA gave Mr. Kander an “F.”

Excellent example of how hard it is to please the NRA. Really, you could serve these people breakfast in bed for a year, but then one day the orange juice is watery and it’s Splitsvill­e.

Mr. Kander, the current Missouri secretary of state, mentions frequently that he volunteere­d for the service after graduating from law school. As for Mr. Blunt, there’s a bit of a controvers­y about whether he avoided Vietnam because he drew a high number in the draft or via student deferments. The answer is both, but I believe I speak for many Americans when I say we’re over that debate. Truly. The man is 66. Let’s go back to the part about how his wife and three adult children are all lobbyists.

The race is close and Mr. Kander cites polls that show most voters are fine with background checks. (The people he talks to, he added, are more worried about college debt, which Mr. Blunt once blamed on students’ “personal living standard.”)

Still, it would be amazing if Missouri elected a candidate who’s middle-of-the-road on guns, right after the state legislatur­e set a record in the extremely competitiv­e category of Loopiest NRA Cave-In.

The massive Republican majority voted, for one thing, to eliminate all training requiremen­ts for concealed weapons permits. “I am in a real estate course,” said Jason Holsman, a state senator from Kansas City, in a phone interview during a class break. “Missouri law requires 72 hours of training before you can sell a house. Now, zero hours before you can carry a concealed gun.”

Actually, the NRA went much, much further, and wiped out the permits entirely. Missourian­s now can just buy a gun and stick it in their pocket. And the new law includes one of those “stand your ground” provisions. So people walking around after dark can reasonably presume that anybody they ran into might have a concealed weapon and would have a right to fire first if they felt physically threatened.

Thanks to Mr. Kander, the voters will at least get to hear a lively statewide debate about whether this is a good plan. Nationally, too, this is the first time in ages that the candidates are having a spirited debate on gun issues.

Back in the day, this wasn’t a matter of partisan divide — Richard Nixon said, “Guns are an abominatio­n,” and George H.W. Bush resigned from the NRA when it failed to support federal investigat­ors after the Oklahoma City terrorist bombing.

Then came 2000. I still remember a moment, during the big presidenti­al debate, when the moderator asked Al Gore how he differed from George W. Bush on guns. I was totally expecting Mr. Gore to retort: “Well, there’s only one of us who thinks it’s a good idea to carry concealed weapons into church.” Instead, he stiffened and said something about not being in favor of registrati­on. Mr. Gore lost, and his fellow Democrats blamed gun control.

Now, Hillary Clinton is running on centrist reforms like background checks, while Donald Trump wants to eliminate gun-free zones at, say, nursery schools and give people from Missouri the right to carry their permit-free concealed weapons in Midtown Manhattan.

In gratitude, the NRA has been running an ad that shows an intruder smashing into a house where a woman is sleeping, alone. When the terrified resident opens the safe where she keeps her gun, said weapon vanishes, and it’s pretty much curtains. This could happen to you, if you let Hillary Clinton take away our “right to self-defense.”

Of course, a woman is less likely to be shot by an intruder than by a member of her family. And really, Missouri, do you want to have everybody in St. Louis carrying a concealed weapon? Let’s talk.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States