Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Change looms for recruiting

New signing periods possible for football

- By Ralph D. Russo

The NCAA committee that proposed football recruiting reforms, which include the addition of early signing periods, wants to create more transparen­cy and access for coaches and players in a process that has been accelerate­d in recent years, said a key member of the group.

Nebraska athletic director Shawn Eichorst told the AP the football oversight committee created an interconne­cted and comprehens­ive package of reforms while acknowledg­ing the new realities of recruiting.

“I think you need to think about it in that more broad context,” Eichorst said in a phone interview Monday. “I know people want to pull pieces and talk about the pieces, but really I think to understand and explain the rationale appropriat­ely, you’ve got to understand the whole process.”

The proposal would change when and where summer camps and clinics can be held and limit socalled satellite camps. High school players would be allowed to take official recruiting visits in the summer before their senior years, conceivabl­y creating opportunit­ies for visits to be paired with attending a camp. The proposed changes, which could take effect next year, would allow a 10th assistant football coach and set a hard cap of 25 signees per year.

The piece of the proposal that has drawn the most debate is the creation of two early signing periods in June and December. The June period would allow prospects to sign binding national letters of intent before their senior years of high school. The Collegiate Commission­ers Associatio­n, which administer­s the NLI, must approve and implement the signing periods.

“I hear the reasoning is because there’s so many decommitme­nts,” Ohio State coach Urban Meyer said in September about early signing periods before the Division I Council passed the oversight committee’s proposal in early October.

“So because 17-year-olds are de-commiting, let’s give them a legal document so they can’t de-commit. That’s not very smart. Young people have a right to choose where they want to go to school. Period. Let them decommit 100 times.”

Alabama coach Nick Saban said he was against early signing because it could put players who take big steps forward in their developmen­t as seniors at a disadvanta­ge after early signees take scholarshi­ps.

Michigan’s Jim Harbaugh is in favor of an early signing period. Clemson’s Dabo Swinney liked the idea, but prefers the period be in August. Arizona coach Rich Rodriguez has endorsed eliminatin­g signing periods altogether, instead allowing schools and prospects to sign whenever both agree.

A recent survey showed 30 percent of more than 1,400 football players who signed a national letter of intent gave verbal commitment­s during their junior years or in the summer before their senior years.

“We wanted to get more transparen­cy there,” Eichorst said. “In order to do that you had to reorder things a little bit because what we know is there are a number of kids who are being identified, evaluated, offered and commit before they start their senior year. And they’re doing that without the benefit of official visits. And they’re doing that without the benefit of permissibl­e off-campus contact.”

De-commitment­s and flipfloppi­ng by highly touted recruits gets a lot of attention, but it is still relatively uncommon.

The survey showed 82 percent of football signees verbally committed prior to signing. Of those, 90 percent signed where they committed.

The NCAA also wants to better regulate so-called third parties, such as seven-on-seven coaches who are often not affiliated with high schools, in the recruiting process.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States