Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Congress needs to reach a budget deal in a matter of days

Mexico border wall, health care remain hot topics

- By Lesley Clark

McClatchy Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — The fate of the federal government — whether it stays open or shuts down at the end of April — is all up to Congress and President Donald Trump.

Republican and Democratic congressio­nal leaders are optimistic that when they return from their recess the last week of April, they’ll reach a deal and avert a government shutdown by April 28, when legislatio­n that is now funding the government expires.

Yet there are a number of issues, including the White House’s push for U.S.-Mexico border wall money and Mr. Trump’s threat this week to pull some health care funding, that could lead to a budget blowup.

It’s happened before: The longest shutdown, in December 1995-January 1996, lasted 21 days. Conservati­ves in the House of Representa­tives prompted a 16-day shutdown in 2013 over opposition to paying for President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act.

This year’s showdown is most likely in the House, where Republican­s are counting on Democratic support to pass a spending bill because some House conservati­ves have steadfastl­y refused to vote for spending bills: “Anything that depends on 216 Republican­s is a highly risky propositio­n,” said Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma, a top Republican on the House Appropriat­ions and Budget committees, citing the number needed to pass legislatio­n in the House.

That could, however, mean White House priorities go wanting, for now. Here’s a look at the potential flashpoint­s:

Trump’s wall

The administra­tion is asking for $1.5 billion to start building a wall along the U.S. southern border. Mr. Trump promised as a candidate that Mexico would pay for the wall, but the administra­tion has since said U.S. tax dollars will finance it.

The request has support from Mr. Trump’s supporters, who note that the short-term spending bill is the first in years not to face a veto threat from Mr. Obama. “Republican­s were elected to majorities in both chambers and the White House, and it’s time to assert their priorities. That includes building the wall,” said Robert Romano, senior editor at Americans for Limited Government, a conservati­ve advocacy group.

It’s a nonstarter with Democrats: “They’ll have to fight it out in their caucus,” Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said of the GOP. “This senator, this caucus, is not going to vote for money for a wall.”

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said the administra­tion would “continue to have conversati­ons with Congress” and was confident the budget would reflect Trump’s priorities.

Renewed mistrust over the failed Obamacare repeal and replace bill

Mr. Trump this week threatened to withhold payments owed to health insurers under the Affordable Care Act as a gambit to force Democrats to the bargaining table.

Democratic leadership will insist that the budget package carries language to ensure the subsidies are paid. Democrats “will not negotiate with hostage takers,” said Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance committee.

Coal miners

A dispute over health care benefits for retired coal miners nearly forced a government shutdown in December. Senate Democrats demanded a permanent extension, but House Republican­s agreed to only four months.

Democrats reluctantl­y accepted the extension but have made it clear they intend to use whatever means they have to get a permanent fix. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is expected to play a decisive role.

‘Poison pills’

These can take many forms, including efforts to defund Planned Parenthood or undermine the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, establishe­d under Mr. Obama. Mr. Trump’s budget director, Mick Mulvaney, is also reportedly asking lawmakers to include language that would curtail money for cities that do not enforce federal immigratio­n policy.

Congressio­nal Democrats say such partisan riders won’t pass muster; advocacy groups say they’re keeping watch.

“Congress is going to have only a few days to resolve” the must-pass legislatio­n, said Robert Weissman, president of the nonpartisa­n group Public Citizen. “It’s an opportunit­y for things to be done in the dark of night, to be done super quickly without adequate public scrutiny.”

The unknown unknowns

Or, there’s always something.

For instance, bad feelings linger over the “nuclear option,” which Republican­s triggered recently to eliminate the 60-vote filibuster threshold for Supreme Court nominees.

Reaching a budget deal “was going to be hard already. This makes it even harder,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., a member of the Senate Appropriat­ions Committee. “You ultimately have to have Republican­s and Democrats working together in order to pass an appropriat­ions package. This doesn’t help relationsh­ips across the aisle.”

It could work the other way, said Sen. Roy Blunt, RMo., a top Senate appropriat­or, who called the budget talks “an opportunit­y to come back together now and get something done and move forward.”

“While I’m confident we will get it done, I don’t like waiting until the last week,” Mr. Cole said. “When you wait until the last minute, something can always go wrong.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States