Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

• Administra­tion may expand military effort against Taliban in Afghanista­n,

- By Missy Ryan and Greg Jaffe

President Donald Trump’s most senior military and foreign policy advisers have proposed a major shift in strategy in Afghanista­n that would effectivel­y put the United States back on a war footing with the Taliban.

The new plan, which still must be approved by the president, calls for expanding the U.S. military role as part of a broader effort to push an increasing­ly confident and resurgent Taliban back to the negotiatin­g table, U.S. officials said.

The plan comes at the end of a sweeping policy review built around the president’s desire to reverse worsening security in Afghanista­n and “start winning” again, said one U.S. official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberati­ons.

The new strategy, which has the backing of top Cabinet officials, would authorize the Pentagon, not the White House, to set troop numbers in Afghanista­n and give the military far broader authority to use airstrikes to target Taliban militants. It would also lift Obama-era restrictio­ns that limited the mobility of U.S. military advisers on the battlefiel­d.

The net result of the changes would be to reverse moves by then-President Barack Obama to steadily limit the U.S. military role in Afghanista­n, along with the risk to American troops and the cost of the war effort, more than 15 years after U.S. forces first arrived there.

Mr. Trump is expected to make a final call on the strategy before a May 25 NATO summit in Brussels that he plans to attend.

Officials said it is unclear whether Mr. Trump, who has spoken little about the U.S.’s longest war, will look favorably upon expanding the U.S. role in Afghanista­n. While he has voiced skepticism about allowing U.S. troops to become bogged down in foreign conflicts, the president has also expressed a desire to be tough on terrorism and has seemed to delight in the use of military force.

“The review is an opportunit­y to send a message that, yes, the U.S. is going to send more troops, but it’s not to achieve a forever military victory,” said Andrew Wilder, an Afghanista­n expert at the U.S. Institute of Peace. “Rather, it’s to try to bring about a negotiated end to this conflict.”

The new strategy is a product of the U.S. military’s mounting worries that the fragile stalemate with the Taliban has been steadily eroding for years, jeopardizi­ng the survival of an allied government and endangerin­g a key U.S. base for combating militant groups such as al-Qaida and the Islamic State group throughout South Asia.

The policy advisers’ proposal comes at a complex and volatile time for Afghanista­n.

Seeking to capitalize on the death of a top IS commander, Afghan forces are surging through districts in eastern Afghanista­n long held by the radical Islamist group as warplanes have pounded militant hideouts in the past week, officials said Monday.

Elsewhere, the Pakistani army says it has destroyed at least five Afghan checkpoint­s near the border between the two countries, killing about 50 security forces in fighting began after Afghan troops fired on Pakistani census workers and the soldiers escorting them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States