Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

State pension imperative

Zippo lights the way on reform — 401(k)-style

- Nathan Benefield Nathan Benefield is vice president and chief operating officer of the Commonweal­th Foundation, Pennsylvan­ia’s free-market think tank.

When you think of lighters, you probably think of Zippo. Over the past 85 years, the iconic Pennsylvan­ia-based manufactur­er has become one of the bestknown brands in the world.

Recently, the company announced a move that shines light of a different kind: Zippo is transition­ing from traditiona­l pension plans for its employees to 401(k)-style defined contributi­on plans. As company CFO Don Hall noted, defined contributi­on plans have more predictabl­e costs while offering valuable retirement benefits.

Mr. Hall’s observatio­n is hardly isolated. For decades, private-sector companies have been making similar moves. Fewer than 5 percent of Fortune 500 companies retain a traditiona­l pension, while 80 percent offer only a 401(k)-style plan, as of 2015.

Gov. Tom Wolf and lawmakers should take note.

Pennsylvan­ia’s statewide pension crisis is no secret. The commonweal­th’s two public pension systems — the Public School Employees’ Retirement System and the State Employees’ Retirement System — recently reported combined unfunded liabilitie­s — or debt owed by taxpayers — of $62.2 billion. PSERS’ debt alone is an astounding $42.72 billion.

Ten years ago, PSERS and SERS were 81 and 92 percent funded, respective­ly. Today, they have enough assets to cover just 60 percent of liabilitie­s. In fact, the state’s pension plans are so underfunde­d that Pennsylvan­ia ranks near rock bottom in the country, according to a Tax Foundation analysis. Just four states have worse funding ratios.

Put bluntly, unless we act now, we risk being unable to keep the promises made to public workers. And everyone — public workers and all taxpayers alike — will suffer.

For proof, look no further than the Pittsburgh Public Schools. At the beginning of 2015, the district’s share of the unfunded pension liability was an incredible $793 million. By year’s end, it had risen to more than $870 million — a 10 percent increase. This increase alone equals the average salary of more than 1,000 classroom teachers.

Other large Pennsylvan­ia school districts have similar pension plights: Philadelph­ia’s 2016 unfunded liability was more than $3 billion, Central Bucks’ was $475 million, and Allentown’s share equaled $346 million.

Families bear the brunt of paying off this debt through ever-rising property taxes.

From 2009 to 2015, school district revenue statewide grew by $3.9 billion to reach an all-time high of more than $27 billion. Yet 47 percent of this increase went to pension payments. This represents an increase of more than $578 per homeowner.

Without a doubt pension costs are the single biggest driver of property tax increases. In fact, over the last five years, 99 percent of school districts seeking exemptions to raise property taxes cited pension costs.

Our public pension system is broken. It puts public workers’ retirement­s at risk; it’s unsustaina­ble for taxpayers; and it’s caused multiple downgrades of our state’s credit ratings.

Moreover, it does a disservice to new public employees. For example, three of four new public schoolteac­hers will never fully vest in today’s pension system. In contrast, 401(k)-style plans offer quick vesting and can be taken to new jobs. In today’s labor market — where workers change jobs an average of 10 times in their careers — portabilit­y is a must.

Fixing public pensions isn’t just common sense; it’s a necessity. We owe it to workers and retirees who are counting on the promises already made to them; we owe it to new teachers who want stability and options, and we owe it to workingfam­ilies who foot the bill.

The state Senate has discussed a proposal that shifts away from unsustaina­ble defined benefit pension plans and includes a 401(k)style component for new public employees. Similar legislatio­n has been introduced in the state House, and voters support this type of reform.

Sadly, for years the staunchest opponents of reform have been government union leaders. From claiming that no pension crisis exists to spreading myths about reform proposals, these union leaders endorse the status quo that saw our state’s pension crisis drive up property taxes and force schools to lay off teachers.

Without reform, the crisis will worsen. However, by acting now, we can fulfill our promise to public employees and build a sustainabl­e pension system for workers and taxpayers alike.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States