A chilling turn
The president’s lack of discipline keeps the worst at bay
President Donald Trump’s opponents have spent his administration’s first months engaged in an unusual but important debate: Is Donald Trump a problem because he is incompetent or because he harbors autocratic designs that threaten American democracy itself?
At the end of his first 100 days, the debate was tilting toward ineptitude. Mr. Trump didn’t know or care much about policy, shifted from one issue position to another, shunned eloquence in favor of often-deranged tweeting and didn’t even bother filling hundreds of government jobs.
The wealthy, especially Wall Street types, rejoiced when Mr. Trump backed away from many of his populist-sounding economic promises, particularly on trade, and moved toward a conventional, if rather radical, conservatism: steep tax cuts for the rich, deregulation on a grand scale. For the privileged, happy days were here again.
Those who fear Mr. Trump’s authoritarian side acknowledged that his potential for excess had been at least partly contained by our system of rights. The freedom to organize and express opposition, the power that free elections confer on every citizen, the independence of the courts and the liberty of the media — all are very much alive.
Nonetheless, members of this anti-Trump wing insisted on vigilance against Mr. Trump’s alarming indifference to the basic norms of self-government, his affection for thuggish leaders and his vicious attitude toward opponents.
Last week, the argument took a sharp, decisive and chilling turn. Mr. Trump proved that we can never be lulled into losing focus on the ways he could undermine the rules and principles of our democratic republic.
Sen. Richard Durbin, DIll., appeared Friday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” and spoke the essential truth: “I think we ought to get to the bottom line here. President Trump is dangerous.” Yes, he is. The firing of James Comey as FBI director and the administration’s fog of lies aimed at clouding the real reason for Mr. Trump’s decision are the most important signs that we have a leader who will do whatever it takes to resist accountability.
He will fire anyone who gets in his way. Mr. Trump’s dismissal of Sally Yates, the acting attorney general, and Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney in New York, can now be seen in a more sinister light. Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general on whom the Trump apparat initially tried to pin responsibility for Mr. Comey’s firing, may be next — if he is the person of integrity his friends describe.
Of course, Mr. Trump can be fairly regarded as both incompetent and authoritarian. We may be saved by the fact that the feckless Trump is often the authoritarian Trump’s worst enemy. If we’re lucky, Mr. Trump’s astonishing indiscipline will be his undoing.
At first, his pathetically deceitful spokespeople tried to pretend that the president’s firing decision arose from a deep if newfound concern for how Mr. Comey had treated Hillary Clinton. Then Mr. Trump blew up his own spin. He told NBC’s Lester Holt that he had long planned to get rid of Mr. Comey, and that it had something to do with “this Russia thing.” Here’s betting that spin will have changed again by the time you read this, since hinting that you’re hindering an investigation of yourself is not a good idea.
Not one word out of Mr. Trump’s White House is believable on its face, and sowing convenient untruth is another mark of autocracy. So is his effort to rig future elections, which is what his commission on “election integrity” is really all about. It will seek to justify making it as hard as possible for Mr. Trump’s opponents, particularly in the minority community, to vote.
And like authoritarians everywhere, he aims not simply to defeat his enemies but to humiliate them. Thus his assault on Mr. Comey in the Holt interview as a “showboat” and “a grandstander” — talk about a lack of self-awareness — and his Twitter threat Friday: “James Comey better hope that there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversation before he starts leaking to the press!” Presidential obsessions with “tapes” are perilous.
Mr. Trump clearly realized that reports of his demanding Mr. Comey’s loyalty made him sound like a mafia don or a two-bit despot.
It was fitting that Mr. Trump’s jolliness with the Russian ambassador and foreign minister was photographically captured last week by Tass, Vladimir Putin’s government news agency. The pesky American media were excluded from this happy meeting of minds. It can no longer be seen as outlandish to suspect that Mr. Trump’s role model is Mr. Putin, a man he has praised for having “very strong control over a country.” This should scare us all to death.